Comparison Overview

Scantech Graphics

VS

HB Digital

Scantech Graphics

7150 Engineer Rd, San Diego, California, US, 92111
Last Update: 2025-12-17

We help you transform your blank space into inspirational and functional areas using art and brand experiences. We print, we design, we install - and we support you through the entire process. Our team of print and creative specialists don’t stop working until you get the result you want; the only goal of our project managers is your success. We offer non-harmful inks, stain-free and germ-free (anti-viral and antimicrobial) materials, plus we provide all-weather solutions, even for damp underground spaces. For the do-it-yourselfer, we offer peel and stick options that are repositionable and removable. Our trade show and conference shop provides turnkey solutions, including branded booths and poster boards for purchase or rent. Our foot traffic expertise ensures perfect flow through your booth - and your entire conference. For your convenience, reordering and choosing from pre-approved graphics can all be done through our online store. We are here for you. We have your back and we are ready to serve. Our customers love us; we know you will too.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

HB Digital

undefined, undefined, undefined, 92648, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

HB Digital provides full-service Graphics, Reprographics and Printing to nearly every segment of society. Whether it's large format digital bonds for the building industry, or logo designs and advertising materials for a new start-up, our success stems from giving our clients the very best service while providing a quality product that is second to none. Using the latest in technology, we fulfil our clients' requests quickly and accurately.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scantech-graphics.jpeg
Scantech Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hb-digital-arts-&-blueprint-inc..jpeg
HB Digital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Scantech Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HB Digital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scantech Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HB Digital in 2025.

Incident History — Scantech Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scantech Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HB Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HB Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scantech-graphics.jpeg
Scantech Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hb-digital-arts-&-blueprint-inc..jpeg
HB Digital
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

HB Digital company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Scantech Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, HB Digital company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Scantech Graphics company.

In the current year, HB Digital company and Scantech Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither HB Digital company nor Scantech Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither HB Digital company nor Scantech Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither HB Digital company nor Scantech Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Scantech Graphics company nor HB Digital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Scantech Graphics nor HB Digital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Scantech Graphics company nor HB Digital company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Scantech Graphics company employs more people globally than HB Digital company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Scantech Graphics nor HB Digital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Scantech Graphics nor HB Digital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Scantech Graphics nor HB Digital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Scantech Graphics nor HB Digital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Scantech Graphics nor HB Digital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Scantech Graphics nor HB Digital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L