Comparison Overview

Scania Group

VS

BorgWarner

Scania Group

Vagnmakarvägen 1, Södertälje, SE, SE-151 87
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Scania is a world-leading provider of transport solutions committed to a better tomorrow. Our purpose is to drive the shift towards a sustainable transport system. In doing so, we are creating a world of mobility that’s better for business, society and our environment. Employing more than 50,000 people in about 100 countries, Scania’s research and development is concentrated in Sweden, while production takes place in Europe and South America.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 30,301
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

BorgWarner

3850 Hamlin Rd, Auburn Hills, Michigan, 48326, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

As a global product leader for over 130 years, we deliver innovative and sustainable mobility solutions. Guided by our commitment to inclusion, integrity, excellence, responsibility and collaboration—and our pledge to reach carbon neutrality by 2035—we’re leading the automotive industry to a future that is cleaner, healthier and safer for all. Start your future with BorgWarner now! We are looking for dedicated, talented people to fill our manufacturing and technical facilities all over the world. For more information, please visit: https://bit.ly/WorkAtBorgWarner For legal and data protection inquiries please visit: https://www.borgwarner.com/legal Career Scam Disclaimer BorgWarner makes no representations or guarantees regarding employment opportunities listed on any third-party website. To protect against career scams, job applicants should take the necessary precautions when interviewing for and accepting employment positions allegedly offered by BorgWarner. Applicants should never provide their Social Security numbers, birth dates, credit card numbers, bank account information or other private information when communicating with prospective employers or responding to employment opportunities online. Job applicants are invited to contact BorgWarner through BorgWarner’s website to verify the authenticity of any employment opportunities.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 18,148
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scania.jpeg
Scania Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/borgwarner.jpeg
BorgWarner
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Scania Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BorgWarner
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Scania Group has 47.06% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BorgWarner in 2025.

Incident History — Scania Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scania Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BorgWarner (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BorgWarner cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scania.jpeg
Scania Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Credentials
Motivation: Extortion
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/borgwarner.jpeg
BorgWarner
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BorgWarner company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Scania Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Scania Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas BorgWarner company has not reported any.

In the current year, Scania Group company has reported more cyber incidents than BorgWarner company.

Neither BorgWarner company nor Scania Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Scania Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other BorgWarner company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither BorgWarner company nor Scania Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Scania Group company nor BorgWarner company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Scania Group nor BorgWarner holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Scania Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to BorgWarner company.

Scania Group company employs more people globally than BorgWarner company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Scania Group nor BorgWarner holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Scania Group nor BorgWarner holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Scania Group nor BorgWarner holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Scania Group nor BorgWarner holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Scania Group nor BorgWarner holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Scania Group nor BorgWarner holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N