Comparison Overview

SBI Card

VS

IIFL (India Infoline Group)

SBI Card

Infinity Tower, DLF City Phase 2, Gurgaon, Haryana, 122002, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.sbicard.com

SBI Card was launched in 1998 with the State Bank of India, India's largest bank, as the majority stakeholder. In March 2020, SBI Card was listed on BSE and NSE. Today, SBI Card is India’s largest pure-play credit card issuer with over 19.5 million cards in force, as of September 2024. Its wide array of products and services caters to a diverse range of customer segments across India, right from new-to-credit to super premium. The SBI Card brand is based on the value proposition of 'Make Life Simple'. The proposition manifests in SBI Card’s continuous efforts to simplify the lives of its customers, employees and other key stakeholders. Customer-centricity, supported by the values of trust and transparency, is core to SBI Card’s ethos.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 21,634
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

IIFL (India Infoline Group)

B Wing, Trade Centre, Kamala Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Off Senapati Bapat Marg,, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400013, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.indiainfoline.com/

IIFL group is one of India's largest diversified financial services conglomerates with three listed entities - IIFL Finance, IIFL Securities and 360 ONE Wealth & Asset Management. Founded in 1995 by Nirmal Jain as a small research house, today IIFL Group employs over 40000 people and caters to over 10 million customers through various financial products and services. Our strength has been to continuously innovate and reinvent ourselves. IIFL’s evolution from an entrepreneurial start-up in 1995 to a full range diversified financial services group is a story of steady growth by adapting to the dynamic business environment, without losing focus on our core domain of financial services. Today IIFL Group manages assets over $50 billion and is present across Asia, Europe and the US. IIFL Group's companies are backed by marquee investors like Fairfax, Bain Capital, The Capital Group and WardFerry among others.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14,869
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sbi-card.jpeg
SBI Card
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/india-infoline-ltd.jpeg
IIFL (India Infoline Group)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SBI Card
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IIFL (India Infoline Group)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SBI Card in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IIFL (India Infoline Group) in 2025.

Incident History — SBI Card (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SBI Card cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IIFL (India Infoline Group) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IIFL (India Infoline Group) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sbi-card.jpeg
SBI Card
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/india-infoline-ltd.jpeg
IIFL (India Infoline Group)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

IIFL (India Infoline Group) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SBI Card company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, IIFL (India Infoline Group) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SBI Card company.

In the current year, IIFL (India Infoline Group) company and SBI Card company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IIFL (India Infoline Group) company nor SBI Card company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IIFL (India Infoline Group) company nor SBI Card company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IIFL (India Infoline Group) company nor SBI Card company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SBI Card company nor IIFL (India Infoline Group) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SBI Card nor IIFL (India Infoline Group) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IIFL (India Infoline Group) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SBI Card company.

SBI Card company employs more people globally than IIFL (India Infoline Group) company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither SBI Card nor IIFL (India Infoline Group) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SBI Card nor IIFL (India Infoline Group) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SBI Card nor IIFL (India Infoline Group) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SBI Card nor IIFL (India Infoline Group) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SBI Card nor IIFL (India Infoline Group) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SBI Card nor IIFL (India Infoline Group) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References