Comparison Overview

Sberbank

VS

VakıfBank

Sberbank

RU
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849

Сбер — крупнейший банк в России, поставщик надёжных технологических решений и один из ведущих финансовых институтов страны. Мы не боимся меняться и открывать новые горизонты, но в то же время остаёмся верными принципам, сформированным за нашу 180-летнюю историю. Такой подход позволяет нам создавать и развивать десятки технологичных направлений. Нашими сервисами пользуются миллионы людей, а над их созданием и совершенствованием работают десятки тысяч сотрудников. Sber is the largest bank in Russia, supplier of reliable technological solutions and one of the leading national financial institutions. We are not afraid to change and open up new horizons, but at the same time we remain true to the principles that have been formed over our 180-year history. This approach allows us to create and develop dozens of technological areas. Our services are used by millions of people, and thousands of employees are working on their creation and improvement.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,459
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

VakıfBank

İstanbul, İstanbul Finans Merkezi, TR, 34415
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

1954 yılında, vakıf kaynaklarını ekonomik kalkınmanın gereksinimleri doğrultusunda en iyi biçimde değerlendirmek amacıyla kurulan VakıfBank, o günden bu yana çağdaş bankacılık yöntemleri ve uygulamalarıyla Türkiye’nin tasarruf düzeyinin gelişim sürecine katkıda bulunmaktadır. VakıfBank; bölgesinin en iyi, en çok tercih edilen ve değer yaratan bankası olma vizyonu doğrultusunda, vakıf kültüründen aldığı güçle, kendisine emanet edilen varlık ve değerleri etkin ve verimli yöneterek müşteriler, çalışanlar, hissedarlar ve topluma kattığı değerleri sürekli artırma misyonuyla hareket etmektedir. Kurumsal, ticari ve küçük işletme bankacılığının yanı sıra bireysel ve özel bankacılık alanlarında da çağdaş bankacılık ürün ve hizmetleri sunan VakıfBank, özellikle bir alanda değil, tüm finansal alanlarda uzmanlaşmış, Türkiye’nin önde gelen bankalarından biridir. Temel bankacılık ürün ve hizmetlerine ek olarak yatırım bankacılığı ve sermaye piyasası faaliyetlerinde de bulunan VakıfBank, iç ve dış ticaretin finansmanında öncü bir rol üstlenmektedir. Ayrıca, finansal iştirakleri aracılığıyla sigortacılıktan finansal kiralama ve factoring hizmetlerine kadar geniş bir yelpazede yer alan finansal ürünleri çağın gerektirdiği yüksek teknolojilerle müşterilerine sunmaktadır. VakıfBank’ın ABD New York, Kuzey Irak Erbil, Katar Doha şubelerinin yanı sıra Bahreyn’de kıyı bankacılığı şubesi bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca, Avusturya’da VakıfBank International AG (Viyana Şubesi ve Almanya’da Köln Şubesi), KKTC’de Tasfiye Halinde World Vakıf UBB. Ltd. ve Kıbrıs Vakıflar Bank. Ltd. olmak üzere yurt dışında üç bankada da iştiraki bulunmaktadır. VakıfBank’ın diğer iştirakleri arasında; Vakıf Faktoring A.Ş., Vakıf Finansal Kiralama A.Ş., Vakıf Gayrimenkul Yatırım Ortaklığı A.Ş., Vakıf Menkul Kıymet Yat. Ort. A.Ş., Vakıf Yatırım Menkul Değerler A.Ş. Vakıf Pazarlama San. ve Ticaret A.Ş., Taksim Otelcilik A.Ş., Vakıf Enerji ve Madencilik A.Ş., Vakıf Gayrimenkul Değerleme A.Ş. bulunmaktadır.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 11,273
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sberbank.jpeg
Sberbank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vakifbank.jpeg
VakıfBank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sberbank
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VakıfBank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sberbank in 2026.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VakıfBank in 2026.

Incident History — Sberbank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sberbank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VakıfBank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VakıfBank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sberbank.jpeg
Sberbank
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vakifbank.jpeg
VakıfBank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sberbank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VakıfBank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, VakıfBank company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sberbank company.

In the current year, VakıfBank company and Sberbank company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither VakıfBank company nor Sberbank company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither VakıfBank company nor Sberbank company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither VakıfBank company nor Sberbank company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sberbank company nor VakıfBank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sberbank nor VakıfBank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sberbank company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to VakıfBank company.

VakıfBank company employs more people globally than Sberbank company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Sberbank nor VakıfBank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sberbank nor VakıfBank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sberbank nor VakıfBank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sberbank nor VakıfBank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sberbank nor VakıfBank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sberbank nor VakıfBank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N