Comparison Overview

Satterley & Kelley PLLC

VS

AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts

Satterley & Kelley PLLC

8700 Westport Road, Louisville, Kentucky, 40242, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

With more than 30 years of combined experience among them, our attorneys have the knowledge and resources necessary to handle any client's case no matter the circumstances or complexities involved. Through our extensive trial experience and skillful settlement negotiations, we fight aggressively to secure the maximum amount of compensation possible for our clients. By using innovative strategies, our law firm has obtained millions of dollars for individuals and their families.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts

c/o The Justice Center of SE Mass, Brockton, Massachusetts, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts places national service members in organizations throughout Massachusetts who provide legal assistance for low-income people in civil matters. Selected candidates receive professional supervision and rigorous training, get a hands-on experience practicing poverty law, and are exposed to a wide range of legal activities and community outreach. ALA-Massachusetts is a project of South Coastal Counties Legal Services, Inc. (SCCLS), a private non-profit law firm providing legal assistance eligible low-income clients. ALA-Massachusetts is funded through the Corporation for National and Community Service and also receives support from the Massachusetts Bar Foundation. ALA-Massachusetts is administered through our state service commission, the Massachusetts Service Alliance, and housed at the Justice Center of Southeast Massachusetts, a wholly owned subsidiary of SCCLS.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/satterley&kelleypllc.jpeg
Satterley & Kelley PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Satterley & Kelley PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Satterley & Kelley PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts in 2025.

Incident History — Satterley & Kelley PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Satterley & Kelley PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/satterley&kelleypllc.jpeg
Satterley & Kelley PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/americorps-legal-advocates-of-massachusetts.jpeg
AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts
Incidents

FAQ

Satterley & Kelley PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Satterley & Kelley PLLC company.

In the current year, AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts company and Satterley & Kelley PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts company nor Satterley & Kelley PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts company nor Satterley & Kelley PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts company nor Satterley & Kelley PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Satterley & Kelley PLLC company nor AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Satterley & Kelley PLLC nor AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Satterley & Kelley PLLC company nor AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts company employs more people globally than Satterley & Kelley PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Satterley & Kelley PLLC nor AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Satterley & Kelley PLLC nor AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Satterley & Kelley PLLC nor AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Satterley & Kelley PLLC nor AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Satterley & Kelley PLLC nor AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Satterley & Kelley PLLC nor AmeriCorps Legal Advocates of Massachusetts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X