Comparison Overview

SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw)

VS

The Venetian Resort Las Vegas

SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw)

1880 Saskatchewan Dr, Regina, S4P 0B2, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Sask Gaming operates Casino Regina and Casino Moose Jaw and has been a vital part of Saskatchewan’s tourism industry since Casino Regina opened in 1996. In 2002 our business grew with the addition of Casino Moose Jaw. By 2008 we were welcoming more than three million guests to our properties each year. Our employees deliver a Five Star entertainment experience, and we were proud to be among Canada’s Top 100 Employers and Saskatchewan’s Top 10 Employers once again in 2008. Our profits go back to the province to fund important projects and initiatives, and we are proud to work with non-profit groups and organizations that make Saskatchewan a great place to be. We are also proud of our responsible gaming program, which provides our guests with information they need to make responsible decisions about their play. We have an exciting future ahead, and look forward to sharing it with the people of Saskatchewan.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 253
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Venetian Resort Las Vegas

3355 Las Vegas Blvd South, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89109, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

The Venetian® Resort Las Vegas is an important part of our global company, and a standard of luxury and service in the industry. We provide the best benefits, opportunity for advancement, and the greatest professionals with which to work. Our company culture is the result of our commitment to our guests, our Team Members, and our community. We are the world’s largest integrated resort, and our people make it the most successful as well.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 3,993
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saskatchewan-gaming-corporation.jpeg
SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-venetian.jpeg
The Venetian Resort Las Vegas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Venetian Resort Las Vegas
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Venetian Resort Las Vegas in 2025.

Incident History — SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Venetian Resort Las Vegas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Venetian Resort Las Vegas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saskatchewan-gaming-corporation.jpeg
SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-venetian.jpeg
The Venetian Resort Las Vegas
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) company.

In the current year, The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company and SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company nor SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company nor SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company nor SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) company nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) company nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Venetian Resort Las Vegas company employs more people globally than SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SaskGaming (Casinos Regina & Moose Jaw) nor The Venetian Resort Las Vegas holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H