Comparison Overview

SAS Daniels LLP

VS

Children's Law Center

SAS Daniels LLP

SAS Daniels LLP, Stockport, Cheshire, SK3 8AD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Understanding your needs. Protecting your interests. At SAS Daniels our team of friendly legal experts is here to support, provide advice and work side-by-side to find you the best solutions. Whether for yourself, your family, or your business, we will get to know your individual needs and tailor legal advice to suit. From wills and wealth planning to corporate and commercial law, our team is here to guide you through the process, using years of industry and local knowledge. We’ll protect your interests, making sure you get advice you can trust so you can achieve the best outcome possible. A Cheshire-based law firm, we have offices in Stockport, Chester, Macclesfield and Congleton. Visit our website to find out how we can help.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 116
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Children's Law Center

501 3rd Street NW, Washington, DC, 20001, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Children’s Law Center believes every child should grow up with a strong foundation of family, health and education and live in a world free from poverty, trauma, racism and other forms of oppression. Our more than 100 staff – together with DC children and families, community partners and pro bono attorneys – use the law to solve children’s urgent problems today and improve the systems that will affect their lives tomorrow. Since our founding in 1996, we have reached more than 50,000 children and families directly and multiplied our impact by advocating for city-wide solutions that benefit hundreds of thousands more.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 146
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sas-daniels-llp.jpeg
SAS Daniels LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-law-center.jpeg
Children's Law Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SAS Daniels LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Children's Law Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAS Daniels LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Children's Law Center in 2025.

Incident History — SAS Daniels LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAS Daniels LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Children's Law Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Children's Law Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sas-daniels-llp.jpeg
SAS Daniels LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-law-center.jpeg
Children's Law Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both SAS Daniels LLP company and Children's Law Center company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Children's Law Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SAS Daniels LLP company.

In the current year, Children's Law Center company and SAS Daniels LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Children's Law Center company nor SAS Daniels LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Children's Law Center company nor SAS Daniels LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Children's Law Center company nor SAS Daniels LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SAS Daniels LLP company nor Children's Law Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SAS Daniels LLP nor Children's Law Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SAS Daniels LLP company nor Children's Law Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Children's Law Center company employs more people globally than SAS Daniels LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither SAS Daniels LLP nor Children's Law Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SAS Daniels LLP nor Children's Law Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SAS Daniels LLP nor Children's Law Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SAS Daniels LLP nor Children's Law Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SAS Daniels LLP nor Children's Law Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SAS Daniels LLP nor Children's Law Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X