Comparison Overview

SARquavitae

VS

Texas Children's Hospital

SARquavitae

Aribau 185 Entlo. Aribau 197 Entlo. Barcelona, Barcelona 08021, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

SARquavitae, personas que cuidan a las personas SARquavitae es la mayor plataforma de España de servicios sanitarios y sociales de atención a las personas. La plantilla, formada por 12.200 profesionales, ofrece más de 10.900 plazas repartidas por todo el territorio español y atiende a unas 200.000 personas al año. La compañía dispone de 51 centros residenciales, 10 centros de atención a la discapacidad, 60 centros de día y 3 complejos de viviendas con servicios. Además, también ofrece diariamente servicio de ayuda a domicilio a más de 31.250 personas y de teleasistencia a 26.500 usuarios.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Texas Children's Hospital

6621 Fannin St., None, Houston, TX, US, 77030
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Texas Children’s Hospital is a world-class pediatric facility, nationally recognized as a top children’s hospital, and voted one of the best places to work in Houston for nine years running. We’re committed to creating a healthy community for children by providing the best pediatric care possible, through groundbreaking research and emphasis on education. We also offer a full continuum of family-centered care for women, from obstetrics to well-woman care. As a team member at Texas Children’s Hospital, you’ll work in an environment that values your voice. Texas Children's Hospital, headquartered in Houston, Texas, is recognized as one of America's best children's hospitals.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 12,568
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sarquavitae.jpeg
SARquavitae
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-children's-hospital.jpeg
Texas Children's Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SARquavitae
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Texas Children's Hospital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SARquavitae in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Children's Hospital in 2025.

Incident History — SARquavitae (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SARquavitae cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Texas Children's Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Children's Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sarquavitae.jpeg
SARquavitae
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-children's-hospital.jpeg
Texas Children's Hospital
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Texas Children's Hospital company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SARquavitae company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Texas Children's Hospital company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SARquavitae company.

In the current year, Texas Children's Hospital company and SARquavitae company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital company nor SARquavitae company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital company nor SARquavitae company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Texas Children's Hospital company nor SARquavitae company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SARquavitae company nor Texas Children's Hospital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SARquavitae nor Texas Children's Hospital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Texas Children's Hospital company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SARquavitae company.

Texas Children's Hospital company employs more people globally than SARquavitae company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither SARquavitae nor Texas Children's Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SARquavitae nor Texas Children's Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SARquavitae nor Texas Children's Hospital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SARquavitae nor Texas Children's Hospital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SARquavitae nor Texas Children's Hospital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SARquavitae nor Texas Children's Hospital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H