Comparison Overview

SARD JV

VS

Accenture Federal Services

SARD JV

University Road, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7FG, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-11 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

We are driven by a singular purpose: elevating the NHS workforce to new heights. Through optimal planning, we craft the future together. Beyond consulting and systems with hands-on Workforce Optimisation Tired of consultants who just point out problems? We go beyond advice to drive real change. Leveraging decades of medical workforce expertise, our team jumps into the trenches alongside you. We combine targeted training, job planning redesign, workforce systems, and analytics to rapidly solve inefficiency issues. Through a proven four step process we: - Deliver the latest job planning best practices via our masterclasses - Streamline and optimise job plans via our review process - Interpret data to inform decision making - Develop demand-driven team job plans We provide both the know-how and doing, so you can focus on patient care. Our hands-on approach builds your team's capabilities while accelerating performance. In the end, youโ€™ll be equipped to continually optimise your workforce and sustain success. No more wasted resources, lack of capacity, or burnout. Ready to elevate your workforce beyond advice? Contact us on [email protected].

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Accenture Federal Services

800 N Glebe Rd, Arlington, VA, 22203, US
Last Update: 2025-02-05 (UTC)

Strong

We power reinvention across the US federal government to help agencies deliver greater outcomes using proven commercial solutions, mission expertise, and new technologies โ€“ cloud, data and AI, platforms and cyber. Itโ€™s how we radically reset problem-solving and help federal leaders deliver breakthrough performance & efficiency with speed and certainty.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,015
Subsidiaries: 33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sard-jv.jpeg
SARD JV
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/accenturefederalservices.jpeg
Accenture Federal Services
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
SARD JV
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Accenture Federal Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SARD JV in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Accenture Federal Services in 2025.

Incident History โ€” SARD JV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SARD JV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Accenture Federal Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Accenture Federal Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sard-jv.jpeg
SARD JV
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/accenturefederalservices.jpeg
Accenture Federal Services
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Data Theft, Extortion
Blog: Blog

FAQ

SARD JV company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Accenture Federal Services company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Accenture Federal Services company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SARD JV company has not reported any.

In the current year, Accenture Federal Services company and SARD JV company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Accenture Federal Services company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while SARD JV company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Accenture Federal Services company nor SARD JV company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Accenture Federal Services company nor SARD JV company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SARD JV company nor Accenture Federal Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Accenture Federal Services company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SARD JV company.

Accenture Federal Services company employs more people globally than SARD JV company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X