Comparison Overview

Sarantitis

VS

List A Barristers Pty Ltd

Sarantitis

9 Anagnostopoulou, Athens, Attiki, GR, 106 73
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Sarantitis is a leading, full service, law firm offering business law advice through its offices in Athens and Piraeus. Our diverse practice encompasses all aspects of commercial law, advising clients on M&A transactions and restructurings, on banking & finance, stock exchange and securities legislation, on all types of commercial agreements, corporate compliance and day-to-day corporate and commercial matters, as well as on insurance law, employment law, real estate law, competition law, energy law, intellectual property law, IT & data protection law and shipping law, whilst our commercial litigation department is one of the most highly regarded in the Greek market.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

List A Barristers Pty Ltd

205 William St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 700 and 749

Formed in 1990, List A is widely recognised as Australia’s leading list of commercial barristers with a national and international reputation for professional excellence and superior quality in the provision of legal services. Its senior practitioners are the leaders of the Victorian Bar and its members represent the Federal and State Governments and Australia’s largest corporations in the provision of advice and advocacy.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sarantitis-law-firm.jpeg
Sarantitis
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barristersmelbourne.jpeg
List A Barristers Pty Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sarantitis
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
List A Barristers Pty Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sarantitis in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for List A Barristers Pty Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Sarantitis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sarantitis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — List A Barristers Pty Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

List A Barristers Pty Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sarantitis-law-firm.jpeg
Sarantitis
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barristersmelbourne.jpeg
List A Barristers Pty Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sarantitis company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to List A Barristers Pty Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, List A Barristers Pty Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sarantitis company.

In the current year, List A Barristers Pty Ltd company and Sarantitis company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither List A Barristers Pty Ltd company nor Sarantitis company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither List A Barristers Pty Ltd company nor Sarantitis company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither List A Barristers Pty Ltd company nor Sarantitis company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sarantitis company nor List A Barristers Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sarantitis nor List A Barristers Pty Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sarantitis company nor List A Barristers Pty Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

List A Barristers Pty Ltd company employs more people globally than Sarantitis company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Sarantitis nor List A Barristers Pty Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sarantitis nor List A Barristers Pty Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sarantitis nor List A Barristers Pty Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sarantitis nor List A Barristers Pty Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sarantitis nor List A Barristers Pty Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sarantitis nor List A Barristers Pty Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X