Comparison Overview

Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd.

VS

Tritura

Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd.

7920 E. Thompson Peak Parkway, Scottsdale, Arizona, 85255, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Santerre & Vande Krol was established by Scott R. Santerre and Douglas R. Vande Krol in 1982; and our professional staff has over 90 years of combined experience in business, tax, estate and retirement planning, and in business and real estate transactions. As with many professions, the trend in legal services has been towards specialization; and our Firm has consciously limited the professional services which we offer to our clients. Both Scott R. Santerre and Douglas R. Vande Krol are tax specialists certified by the Arizona Board of Legal Specialization; and all members of our professional team work in specific areas of the practice in which they are knowledgeable. By limiting the scope of legal services to those matters in which our Firm is most knowledgeable and experienced, we are able to provide a higher quality of professional service to our clients in a more efficient and effective manner. When a client's legal needs involve matters outside of those areas in which our Firm practices, we will assist that client in locating other professionals who are best qualified to meet those needs.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tritura

1500 K Street, Suite 1100, Washington, 20005, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Where data science and legal expertise intersect. Only Tritura delivers meaningful data-driven insights and helps you put them into practice for better legal and business outcomes. Tritura solves high-volume legal and compliance data investigation challenges. We quickly discover the facts—wherever they are—and deliver the meaningful insights and legal strategy you need to achieve your objectives. Tritura is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath, LLP.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/santerre-&-vande-krol-ltd..jpeg
Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tritura-llc.jpeg
Tritura
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tritura
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tritura in 2025.

Incident History — Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tritura (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tritura cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/santerre-&-vande-krol-ltd..jpeg
Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tritura-llc.jpeg
Tritura
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tritura company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tritura company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. company.

In the current year, Tritura company and Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tritura company nor Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tritura company nor Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tritura company nor Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. company nor Tritura company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. nor Tritura holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. company nor Tritura company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tritura company employs more people globally than Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. nor Tritura holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. nor Tritura holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. nor Tritura holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. nor Tritura holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. nor Tritura holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Santerre & Vande Krol, Ltd. nor Tritura holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X