Comparison Overview

Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival

VS

MDW

Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival

208 Griffin St, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87501, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sfcmf.org

2024 will be the Festival's 51st season and we have an unforgettable lineup of internationally renowned artists joining us to launch our second half-century. Join us for this special year spotlighting the Festival's commitment to presenting the highest-quality chamber music performances and contributing to Santa Fe's robust creative economy, as well as its devotion to providing music education programs to 5,000+ local children and youth every year.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

MDW

None
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 800 and 849
http://www.mdw.com

MDW is a performing arts collective. We welcome new mebers and are always looking for new performers. Artists who participate in performing arts in front of an audience are called performers, including actors, comedians, dancers, magicians, musicians, and singers. Performing arts are also supported by workers in related fields, such as songwriting and stagecraft.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/santa-fe-chamber-music.jpeg
Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
MDW
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MDW
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MDW in 2025.

Incident History — Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MDW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MDW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/santa-fe-chamber-music.jpeg
Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
MDW
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MDW company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MDW company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival company.

In the current year, MDW company and Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MDW company nor Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MDW company nor Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MDW company nor Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival company nor MDW company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival nor MDW holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival company nor MDW company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MDW company employs more people globally than Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival nor MDW holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival nor MDW holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival nor MDW holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival nor MDW holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival nor MDW holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival nor MDW holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References