Comparison Overview

Santa Fe Botanical Garden

VS

Computer History Museum

Santa Fe Botanical Garden

Museum Hill, 725 Camino Lejo, Suite E, Santa Fe, New Mexico, US, 87505
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.santafebotanicalgarden.org

The Santa Fe Botanical Garden (SFBG) celebrates, cultivates and conserves the rich botanical heritage and biodiversity of our region. In partnership with nature, we demonstrate our commitment through education, community service and the sustainable management of our public garden. The Santa Fe Botanical Garden located at Museum Hill, southeast of historic downtown, nestled in a piñon-juniper woodland landscape. The garden features three main sections: the Orchard Gardens with an orchard, perennial borders, roses and lavender, meadow, and xeric garden; Ojos y Manos: Eyes and Hands, an ethnobotanical garden featuring raised beds for annual crops and an extensive collection of plants with traditional uses; and the Piñon-Juniper Woodland, a natural area showcasing native plants common to the community.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Computer History Museum

1401 N Shoreline Blvd, Mountain View, CA, 94043, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799
http://www.computerhistory.org

CHM DECODES TECHNOLOGY FOR EVERYONE. From the heart of Silicon Valley, we share insights gleaned from our research, our events, and our incomparable collection of computing artifacts and oral histories to convene, inform, and inspire people to build a better world. WE BELIEVE: - Technological progress should be in service to human progress. - Technology created and applied ethically can expand access to opportunity. - Our computational past informs our digital present with lessons that span generations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 154
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/santa-fe-botanical-garden.jpeg
Santa Fe Botanical Garden
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/computer-history-museum.jpeg
Computer History Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Santa Fe Botanical Garden
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Computer History Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Santa Fe Botanical Garden in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Computer History Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Santa Fe Botanical Garden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Santa Fe Botanical Garden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Computer History Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Computer History Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/santa-fe-botanical-garden.jpeg
Santa Fe Botanical Garden
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/computer-history-museum.jpeg
Computer History Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Computer History Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Santa Fe Botanical Garden company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Computer History Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Santa Fe Botanical Garden company.

In the current year, Computer History Museum company and Santa Fe Botanical Garden company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Computer History Museum company nor Santa Fe Botanical Garden company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Computer History Museum company nor Santa Fe Botanical Garden company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Computer History Museum company nor Santa Fe Botanical Garden company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Santa Fe Botanical Garden company nor Computer History Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Santa Fe Botanical Garden nor Computer History Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Santa Fe Botanical Garden company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Computer History Museum company.

Computer History Museum company employs more people globally than Santa Fe Botanical Garden company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Santa Fe Botanical Garden nor Computer History Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Santa Fe Botanical Garden nor Computer History Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Santa Fe Botanical Garden nor Computer History Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Santa Fe Botanical Garden nor Computer History Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Santa Fe Botanical Garden nor Computer History Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Santa Fe Botanical Garden nor Computer History Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References