Comparison Overview

Sanoma

VS

Montgomery Magazine

Sanoma

Töölönlahdenkatu 2, Helsinki, 00089, FI
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Sanoma is an innovative and agile learning and media company impacting the lives of millions every day. Our Sustainability Strategy is designed to maximise our positive ‘brainprint’ on society and to minimise our environmental footprint. We are committed to the UN Sustainable Development Goals and signatory to the UN Global Compact. Our learning products and services enable teachers to develop the talents of every child to reach their full potential. We offer printed and digital learning content as well as digital learning and teaching platforms for primary, secondary and vocational education, and want to grow our business. Our Finnish media provide independent journalism and engaging entertainment also for generations to come. Our unique cross-media position offers the widest reach and tailored marketing solutions for our business partners. Today, we operate in twelve European countries and employ more than 5,000 professionals. In 2023, our net sales amounted to approx. 1.4bn€ and our operational EBIT margin excl. PPA was 12.6%. Sanoma shares are listed on Nasdaq Helsinki. More information is available at sanoma.com.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 852
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Montgomery Magazine

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Montgomery Magazine is a bimonthly and full-color, glossy lifestyle magazine that celebrates the diversity and unique character of Montgomery County, Maryland. Features and departments in each issue offer readers infotainment: profiles of celebrities and other well-known area residents, local resources, the arts, dining, local history, great getaways in and around the county, and tips for improving health, decorating, landscaping, personal finances and more. Montgomery Magazine is a division of Insight Media LLC.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sanoma.jpeg
Sanoma
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/montgomery-magazine.jpeg
Montgomery Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sanoma
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Montgomery Magazine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sanoma in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Montgomery Magazine in 2025.

Incident History — Sanoma (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sanoma cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Montgomery Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Montgomery Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sanoma.jpeg
Sanoma
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/montgomery-magazine.jpeg
Montgomery Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sanoma company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Montgomery Magazine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Montgomery Magazine company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sanoma company.

In the current year, Montgomery Magazine company and Sanoma company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Montgomery Magazine company nor Sanoma company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Montgomery Magazine company nor Sanoma company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Montgomery Magazine company nor Sanoma company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sanoma company nor Montgomery Magazine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sanoma nor Montgomery Magazine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sanoma company nor Montgomery Magazine company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sanoma company employs more people globally than Montgomery Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Sanoma nor Montgomery Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sanoma nor Montgomery Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sanoma nor Montgomery Magazine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sanoma nor Montgomery Magazine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sanoma nor Montgomery Magazine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sanoma nor Montgomery Magazine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.