Comparison Overview

Sanlam

VS

Old Mutual South Africa

Sanlam

ZA
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

We’ve finally given a name to that special something a person exudes when they have a plan for their finances. It’s called The F Factor – and now that you know its name, it’s time you feel it too. Let's unlock your financial confidence, together.​ Our team is online weekdays 8:30 – 16:00

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 20,110
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Old Mutual South Africa

107 Rivonia Road, Sandton, Gauteng, 2196, ZA
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Old Mutual Limited is a premium pan-African financial services group that offers a broad spectrum of financial solutions to retail and corporate customers across key markets in 14 countries. We have been helping our customers achieve their lifetime financial goals for over 170 years by investing their funds in ways that create positive futures for them, their families, their communities and broader society. In this way, we significantly contribute to improving the lives of our customers and their communities while ensuring a sustainable future for our business. We employ more than 30 000 people and operate in 14 countries across two regions Africa (South Africa, Namibia, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Kenya, Malawi, Tanzania, Nigeria, Ghana, Uganda, Rwanda, South Sudan and eSwatini) as well as Asia (China) So why work here? We believe you can shape the future with us – a future where we build a better Africa together. That’s why we’re committed to creating opportunities that will give you an edge on the rest. Once you’re part of our team, you will have access to the best breed of advice, tools and frameworks that will equip you to be your exceptional best. #MomentsThatMatter

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 16,654
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sanlam.jpeg
Sanlam
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/old-mutual-south-africa.jpeg
Old Mutual South Africa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sanlam
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Old Mutual South Africa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sanlam in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Old Mutual South Africa in 2025.

Incident History — Sanlam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sanlam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Old Mutual South Africa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Old Mutual South Africa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sanlam.jpeg
Sanlam
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/old-mutual-south-africa.jpeg
Old Mutual South Africa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Old Mutual South Africa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sanlam company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Old Mutual South Africa company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sanlam company.

In the current year, Old Mutual South Africa company and Sanlam company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Old Mutual South Africa company nor Sanlam company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Old Mutual South Africa company nor Sanlam company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Old Mutual South Africa company nor Sanlam company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sanlam company nor Old Mutual South Africa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sanlam nor Old Mutual South Africa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sanlam company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Old Mutual South Africa company.

Sanlam company employs more people globally than Old Mutual South Africa company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Sanlam nor Old Mutual South Africa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sanlam nor Old Mutual South Africa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sanlam nor Old Mutual South Africa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sanlam nor Old Mutual South Africa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sanlam nor Old Mutual South Africa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sanlam nor Old Mutual South Africa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N