Comparison Overview

Sanlam

VS

CreditEase

Sanlam

ZA
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

We’ve finally given a name to that special something a person exudes when they have a plan for their finances. It’s called The F Factor – and now that you know its name, it’s time you feel it too. Let's unlock your financial confidence, together.​ Our team is online weekdays 8:30 – 16:00

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 20,110
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CreditEase

朝阳区建国路88号SOHO现代城16层, 北京, 北京, undefined, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 2006, CreditEase is a Beijing-based world-leading FinTech conglomerate in China. It specializes in inclusive finance and wealth management with a dominant position in credit technology, wealth management technology, insurance technology, etc. Main business sectors of CreditEase include Yiren Digital, CreditEase Wealth Management and CreditEase Insurance. Better tech, better finance, better world.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16,982
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sanlam.jpeg
Sanlam
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/creditease.jpeg
CreditEase
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sanlam
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CreditEase
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sanlam in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CreditEase in 2025.

Incident History — Sanlam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sanlam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CreditEase (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CreditEase cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sanlam.jpeg
Sanlam
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/creditease.jpeg
CreditEase
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sanlam company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CreditEase company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CreditEase company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sanlam company.

In the current year, CreditEase company and Sanlam company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CreditEase company nor Sanlam company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CreditEase company nor Sanlam company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CreditEase company nor Sanlam company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sanlam company nor CreditEase company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sanlam nor CreditEase holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sanlam company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CreditEase company.

Sanlam company employs more people globally than CreditEase company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Sanlam nor CreditEase holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sanlam nor CreditEase holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sanlam nor CreditEase holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sanlam nor CreditEase holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sanlam nor CreditEase holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sanlam nor CreditEase holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N