Comparison Overview

SANG

VS

US Army Corps of Engineers

SANG

Saudia Arabia Saudia Arabia, 11554, SA
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Saudi Arabian National Guard المهمة الأساسية للحرس الوطني هي : الحفاظ على الأمن، والاستقرار الداخلي للوطن، والدفاع عن مقدّساته ومكتسباته الحضارية . ومن مـهامه الأخرى ما يلي: •حماية المنشآت الحيوية، والإستراتيجية التي يُكَلَّف بها. • المشاركة في وضع خطط الكوارث،وتنفيذها. • المشاركة في حفظ أمن ضيوف الرحمن، خلال مواسم الحج، وتقديم العون والمساعدة، والإرشاد الديني، والرعاية الصحية لهم. • تقديم الخدمات الصحيّة ، والتعليميّة، والثقافيّة، والإعلاميّة، والعناية بالجانب الإرشاديّ والتوجيهيّ، ونشر الوعي الدينيّ لمنسوبيه. • الحفاظ على التراث الوطني، ونشر الثقافة. • المساهمة في تنمية الوطن، وبناء المواطن. • التعاون مع الجهات الرسميّة في نطاق ما تنص عليه الأوامر، وما تقتضيه المصلحة العامة.

NAICS: 928
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

US Army Corps of Engineers

441 G Street NW, Washington, DC, 20314, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mission: Provide vital public engineering services in peace and war to strengthen our Nation’s security, energize the economy, and reduce risks from disasters. Privacy Policy/Social Media Guidelines: https://www.usace.army.mil/SocialMedia/ U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Vision: A GREAT engineering force of highly disciplined people working with our partners through disciplined thought and action to deliver innovative and sustainable solutions to the Nation’s engineering challenges.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 26,693
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sang.jpeg
SANG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-army-corps-of-engineers.jpeg
US Army Corps of Engineers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SANG
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
US Army Corps of Engineers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SANG in 2025.

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for US Army Corps of Engineers in 2025.

Incident History — SANG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SANG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — US Army Corps of Engineers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Army Corps of Engineers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sang.jpeg
SANG
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-army-corps-of-engineers.jpeg
US Army Corps of Engineers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

US Army Corps of Engineers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SANG company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, US Army Corps of Engineers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SANG company.

In the current year, US Army Corps of Engineers company and SANG company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither US Army Corps of Engineers company nor SANG company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither US Army Corps of Engineers company nor SANG company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither US Army Corps of Engineers company nor SANG company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SANG company nor US Army Corps of Engineers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SANG nor US Army Corps of Engineers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SANG company nor US Army Corps of Engineers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

US Army Corps of Engineers company employs more people globally than SANG company, reflecting its scale as a Armed Forces.

Neither SANG nor US Army Corps of Engineers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SANG nor US Army Corps of Engineers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SANG nor US Army Corps of Engineers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SANG nor US Army Corps of Engineers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SANG nor US Army Corps of Engineers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SANG nor US Army Corps of Engineers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H