Comparison Overview

SANBlaze

VS

Xi3

SANBlaze

One Monarch Drive, Suite204, Littleton, MA, 01460, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

SANBlaze Technology, Inc. is a pioneer in storage emulation technologies and a leading provider of storage, networking and multifunction solutions for embedded systems. SANBlaze emulation systems are deployed in the test and development labs of most major storage hardware and software vendors worldwide. SANBlaze embedded computing products include a complete line of ATCA® and AMC board level solutions, as well as preconfigured and integrated systems solutions. These products are deployed into telecom and defense applications

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Xi3

299 South Main Street, Salt Lake City, UT, 84111, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founded by Jason Sullivan in 2010, Xi3 has created a new type of computing – modular computing – initially in the Xi3 Modular Computer (Model X5A). As pioneers in the post-PC era, our vision is to re-imagine traditional computers into completely new, universal and energy efficient modular computers. At the center of Xi3 is the building block approach of the Xi3 Computer Architecture, which revolutionizes the way computers adapt, scale and economize. The company’s award-winning product lineup includes computers, storage solutions and a gaming console. For more information on Xi3 Corporation please visit www.Xi3.com.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sanblaze-technology-inc-.jpeg
SANBlaze
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xi3.jpeg
Xi3
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SANBlaze
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Xi3
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SANBlaze in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Xi3 in 2025.

Incident History — SANBlaze (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SANBlaze cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Xi3 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Xi3 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sanblaze-technology-inc-.jpeg
SANBlaze
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xi3.jpeg
Xi3
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SANBlaze company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Xi3 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Xi3 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SANBlaze company.

In the current year, Xi3 company and SANBlaze company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Xi3 company nor SANBlaze company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Xi3 company nor SANBlaze company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Xi3 company nor SANBlaze company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SANBlaze company nor Xi3 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SANBlaze nor Xi3 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SANBlaze company nor Xi3 company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SANBlaze company employs more people globally than Xi3 company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither SANBlaze nor Xi3 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SANBlaze nor Xi3 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SANBlaze nor Xi3 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SANBlaze nor Xi3 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SANBlaze nor Xi3 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SANBlaze nor Xi3 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H