Comparison Overview

San Mateo County Libraries

VS

Nota

San Mateo County Libraries

125 Lessingia Court, San Mateo, CA, 94402, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

San Mateo County Libraries is a Joint Powers Authority that comprises the cities of Atherton, Belmont, Brisbane, East Palo Alto, Foster City, Half Moon Bay, Millbrae, Pacifica, Portola Valley, San Carlos, Woodside, and the unincorporated areas of San Mateo County. We ignite growth through transformative experiences. It’s our mission to strengthen our community by creating an inclusive sense of place and environment for learning. San Mateo County Libraries are incomparable destinations for exploration. Each of our twelve libraries is part of a larger family offering welcoming spaces with friendly faces and worlds of discovery and technological opportunities. We’re here to serve our communities through every chapter of their lives. Visit smcl.org for information about our community libraries and their services. Interested in working for the San Mateo County Libraries? View all job openings here: http://smcl.org/library-jobs/ Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, & Instagram: @SMCLibraries

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 202
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Nota

Teglværksgade 37, København, undefined, 2100, DK
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Nota is the Danish Library and Expertise Center for people with print disabilities. To become a member of Nota you must be able to document that you cannot read ordinary printed text. Members of Nota are visually impaired, dyslexic or otherwise impaired. Nota’s collection of accessible digital books holds more than 50.000 audio books, e-books and Braille books. Nota offers fiction and non-fiction, study books and school books.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 173
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-mateo-county-library.jpeg
San Mateo County Libraries
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nota.jpeg
Nota
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
San Mateo County Libraries
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nota
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for San Mateo County Libraries in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nota in 2025.

Incident History — San Mateo County Libraries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

San Mateo County Libraries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nota (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nota cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-mateo-county-library.jpeg
San Mateo County Libraries
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nota.jpeg
Nota
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

San Mateo County Libraries company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nota company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nota company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to San Mateo County Libraries company.

In the current year, Nota company and San Mateo County Libraries company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nota company nor San Mateo County Libraries company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nota company nor San Mateo County Libraries company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nota company nor San Mateo County Libraries company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither San Mateo County Libraries company nor Nota company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither San Mateo County Libraries nor Nota holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither San Mateo County Libraries company nor Nota company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

San Mateo County Libraries company employs more people globally than Nota company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither San Mateo County Libraries nor Nota holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither San Mateo County Libraries nor Nota holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither San Mateo County Libraries nor Nota holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither San Mateo County Libraries nor Nota holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither San Mateo County Libraries nor Nota holds HIPAA certification.

Neither San Mateo County Libraries nor Nota holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.