Comparison Overview

San Francisco Symphony

VS

Colorado Ballet

San Francisco Symphony

201 Van Ness Avenue, None, San Francisco, California, US, 94102
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 700 and 749

Founded in 1911, the San Francisco Symphony is one of the most adventurous and innovative arts institutions in the United States. Celebrated for its artistic excellence, creative performance concepts, award-winning recordings, and standard-setting education programs, the Symphony continues to shape the future of orchestral music, making a lasting impact on the cultural fabric of San Francisco and the world.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 346
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Colorado Ballet

1075 Santa Fe Drive, Denver, CO, US, 80204
Last Update: 2025-12-15

Established in 1961 by Lillian Covillo and Freidann Parker, Colorado Ballet is a non-profit organization celebrating more than 50 years of presenting world-class classical ballet and superior dance in Denver. Colorado Ballet is a multi-faceted institution, encompassing a 30 member professional performing company, a studio company for advanced dance students who aspire to professional careers in dance, an Academy instructing the next generation of dancers, and an amazing education and community engagement department that enables thousands to experience the magic of dance. For more information, visit www.coloradoballet.org.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 152
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-francisco-symphony.jpeg
San Francisco Symphony
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-ballet.jpeg
Colorado Ballet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
San Francisco Symphony
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Colorado Ballet
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for San Francisco Symphony in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colorado Ballet in 2025.

Incident History — San Francisco Symphony (X = Date, Y = Severity)

San Francisco Symphony cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Colorado Ballet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colorado Ballet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-francisco-symphony.jpeg
San Francisco Symphony
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-ballet.jpeg
Colorado Ballet
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Colorado Ballet company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to San Francisco Symphony company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

San Francisco Symphony company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Colorado Ballet company has not reported any.

In the current year, Colorado Ballet company and San Francisco Symphony company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Colorado Ballet company nor San Francisco Symphony company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

San Francisco Symphony company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Colorado Ballet company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Colorado Ballet company nor San Francisco Symphony company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither San Francisco Symphony company nor Colorado Ballet company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither San Francisco Symphony nor Colorado Ballet holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither San Francisco Symphony company nor Colorado Ballet company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

San Francisco Symphony company employs more people globally than Colorado Ballet company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither San Francisco Symphony nor Colorado Ballet holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither San Francisco Symphony nor Colorado Ballet holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither San Francisco Symphony nor Colorado Ballet holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither San Francisco Symphony nor Colorado Ballet holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither San Francisco Symphony nor Colorado Ballet holds HIPAA certification.

Neither San Francisco Symphony nor Colorado Ballet holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N