Comparison Overview

SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

VS

Niagara History Center

SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

151 Third Street, San Francisco, CA, 94103, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Art transforms lives. It provokes us to think, to express, to explore our own creativity, to envision new possibilities. SFMOMA expanded the museum to provide a better experience for our visitors and a better home for our expanding collections, including the SFMOMA collection and the Fisher Collection, one of the finest collections of contemporary art in the world. The new SFMOMA, designed in collaboration with the architecture firm Snøhetta, opened May 2016. With this project, we are transforming not just the museum's physical presence, but also our contributions to the community, enhancing SFMOMA's role as a place for learning, inspiration, and interaction for visitors from the Bay Area and beyond. We are making SFMOMA a magnet for contemporary art and for the audiences who will engage with it. View our current job listings → https://www.sfmoma.org/join-the-team

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 521
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Niagara History Center

215 Niagara St, Lockport, 14094, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Niagara History Center is dedicated to the preservation, promotion, and interpretation of the diverse cultural heritage of the people, places, and events related to Niagara County and the Erie Canal. It spans three properties and seven buildings in historic Lockport: the main campus at 215 Niagara Street, the Col. William Bond/Jesse Hawley House at 143 Ontario Street, and The Erie Canal Discovery Center at 24 Church Street.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-francisco-museum-of-modern-art.jpeg
SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/niagara-history-center.jpeg
Niagara History Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Niagara History Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Niagara History Center in 2026.

Incident History — SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Niagara History Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Niagara History Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-francisco-museum-of-modern-art.jpeg
SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/niagara-history-center.jpeg
Niagara History Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Niagara History Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Niagara History Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art company.

In the current year, Niagara History Center company and SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Niagara History Center company nor SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Niagara History Center company nor SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Niagara History Center company nor SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art company nor Niagara History Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art nor Niagara History Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art company nor Niagara History Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art company employs more people globally than Niagara History Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art nor Niagara History Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art nor Niagara History Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art nor Niagara History Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art nor Niagara History Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art nor Niagara History Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art nor Niagara History Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H