Comparison Overview

SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

VS

Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21

SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

151 Third Street, San Francisco, CA, 94103, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Art transforms lives. It provokes us to think, to express, to explore our own creativity, to envision new possibilities. SFMOMA expanded the museum to provide a better experience for our visitors and a better home for our expanding collections, including the SFMOMA collection and the Fisher Collection, one of the finest collections of contemporary art in the world. The new SFMOMA, designed in collaboration with the architecture firm Snøhetta, opened May 2016. With this project, we are transforming not just the museum's physical presence, but also our contributions to the community, enhancing SFMOMA's role as a place for learning, inspiration, and interaction for visitors from the Bay Area and beyond. We are making SFMOMA a magnet for contemporary art and for the audiences who will engage with it. View our current job listings → https://www.sfmoma.org/join-the-team

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 521
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21

1055 Marginal Road, Halifax, B3H 4P7, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 is located in the national historic site at the Halifax seaport where nearly one million immigrants landed in Canada from 1928 to 1971. Today, as Canada’s sixth national museum, we share the ongoing story of immigration to Canada—past to present, and coast to coast. Our exhibits immerse visitors in the immigration experience and allow for a deeper understanding of how newcomers shape our country. Our staff and collections provide opportunities for visitors to discover the countless journeys to Canada and find their own family’s connection to the story. Countless Journeys. One Canada.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 94
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-francisco-museum-of-modern-art.jpeg
SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canadianmuseumofimmigration.jpeg
Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 in 2026.

Incident History — SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-francisco-museum-of-modern-art.jpeg
SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/canadianmuseumofimmigration.jpeg
Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art company.

In the current year, Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 company and SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 company nor SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 company nor SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 company nor SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art company nor Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art nor Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art company nor Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art company employs more people globally than Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art nor Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art nor Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art nor Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art nor Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art nor Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SFMOMA San Francisco Museum of Modern Art nor Canadian Museum of Immigration at Pier 21 / Musée canadien de l'immigration du Quai 21 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N