Comparison Overview

San Diego Sign Company, Inc.

VS

ABS Graphics

San Diego Sign Company, Inc.

3201 Lionshead Ave., Carlsbad, CA, 92010, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sdsign.com

San Diego Sign Company, Inc. is a leader in the trade show industry. We print in house on one of our many large format printers. We specialize in direct to print fabric printing. We have two printing and warehouse locations. A 30,000 sq. ft. facility in Carlsbad, CA, and a 20,000 sq. ft. facility in Harrisburg, PA . We are a direct importer and ware house large quantities of our products. We are able to offer quality stands at very affordable prices.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

ABS Graphics

900 N. Rohlwing Road, Itasca, IL, 60143, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.absgraphics.com

ABS Graphics is a print and fulfillment organization that excels at helping national brand managers with both in-store and B2C direct marketing. ABS's range of production methods and secure innovative technology ensure greater efficiency, accuracy and profitability for our clients. ABS is a single-source, trusted partner for multi-dimensional communication programs. >Over 40 years of experience > State-of-the-art technology and deep expertise >Sheet-fed, web, screen, digital, and large format print capabilities >Complete in-house bindery, mailing and fulfillment >Distribution and logistics >Online solutions including Web2Print digital storefronts >1 -1 strategic campaigns with measurement >Secure data management >Multi-media campaigns >FSC, SFI and Rainforest Alliance Certified; G7 Master Printer >Extensive experience serving industries related to financial, insurance, healthcare, human resources, government, associations, retail, loyalty programs and auto-dealership networks

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 214
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-diego-sign-company-inc-.jpeg
San Diego Sign Company, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abs-graphics.jpeg
ABS Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
San Diego Sign Company, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ABS Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for San Diego Sign Company, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABS Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — San Diego Sign Company, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

San Diego Sign Company, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ABS Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABS Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-diego-sign-company-inc-.jpeg
San Diego Sign Company, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abs-graphics.jpeg
ABS Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ABS Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to San Diego Sign Company, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ABS Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to San Diego Sign Company, Inc. company.

In the current year, ABS Graphics company and San Diego Sign Company, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ABS Graphics company nor San Diego Sign Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ABS Graphics company nor San Diego Sign Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ABS Graphics company nor San Diego Sign Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither San Diego Sign Company, Inc. company nor ABS Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither San Diego Sign Company, Inc. nor ABS Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither San Diego Sign Company, Inc. company nor ABS Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ABS Graphics company employs more people globally than San Diego Sign Company, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither San Diego Sign Company, Inc. nor ABS Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither San Diego Sign Company, Inc. nor ABS Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither San Diego Sign Company, Inc. nor ABS Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither San Diego Sign Company, Inc. nor ABS Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither San Diego Sign Company, Inc. nor ABS Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither San Diego Sign Company, Inc. nor ABS Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References