Comparison Overview

San Diego Printers

VS

Rudico

San Diego Printers

9190 Camino Santa Fe, San Diego, CA, 92121, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Make our customer jobs easier! That is our goal. We do it by using our experience, knowledge and equipment to provide our customer print, binding and fulfillment solutions. We are a well-known business-to-business printer who does offset and digital printing for local, regional and national businesses. We print everything from business cards to Annual reports and catalogs. We print from 1 copy to thousands. Big or small we print it all! Our services include: prepress, graphic design, printing, bindery, fulfillment and mailing. During 30 years in business, we have developed the reputation as a reliable, quality print provider who is cost-effective, with integrity and customer-services the cornerstones to our business.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rudico

Coldenhovenseweg 85, Eerbeek, 6961 EC, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

With more than 50 years of experience, Rudico Prepress operates in every segment of the flexographic packaging industry. Standardised processes and consistent process- based thinking to meet the customer’s needs mean that every idea is converted into a perfect image carrier by a skilful, enthusiastic team. Rudico Prepress has its own online customer portal, which makes it very easy to supply documents. The customer can also find the latest status of the order on the customer portal, which creates openness and transparency. In addition, it speeds up communication between the customer and Rudico Prepress, which has a positive effect on the delivery time of the image carrier. To guarantee high quality, Rudico operates based on a standardised system, and Rudico Prepress is ISO 9001:2008 certified. People and the environment are also very important to Rudico Prepress, which is why it operates according to the ISO 14001, ISO 22000 and DFTA standards.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-diego-printers.jpeg
San Diego Printers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rudico.jpeg
Rudico
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
San Diego Printers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rudico
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for San Diego Printers in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rudico in 2025.

Incident History — San Diego Printers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

San Diego Printers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rudico (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rudico cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-diego-printers.jpeg
San Diego Printers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rudico.jpeg
Rudico
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

San Diego Printers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rudico company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rudico company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to San Diego Printers company.

In the current year, Rudico company and San Diego Printers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rudico company nor San Diego Printers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rudico company nor San Diego Printers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rudico company nor San Diego Printers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither San Diego Printers company nor Rudico company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither San Diego Printers nor Rudico holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither San Diego Printers company nor Rudico company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

San Diego Printers company employs more people globally than Rudico company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither San Diego Printers nor Rudico holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither San Diego Printers nor Rudico holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither San Diego Printers nor Rudico holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither San Diego Printers nor Rudico holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither San Diego Printers nor Rudico holds HIPAA certification.

Neither San Diego Printers nor Rudico holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L