Comparison Overview

The San Diego Regional Center

VS

Ginger Cove

The San Diego Regional Center

4355 Ruffin Rd., San Diego, CA, 92123, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

The San Diego Regional Center is one of 21 Regional Centers for persons with developmental disabilities in the State of California. The centers were established in 1965 under legislation sponsored by Assemblyman Frank Lanterman. The Lanterman Act became effective in 1969 and established the statewide Regional Center network. The Legislation later expanded the populations served to include persons with intellectual disabilities, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, autism, and other disabling conditions similar to intellectual disabilities. The San Diego Regional Center was the third Regional Center established in California. It currently serves over 40,000 people living in San Diego and Imperial Counties.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 604
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ginger Cove

4000 River Crescent Dr, Annapolis, 21401, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Are you looking to be part of a professional team focused on providing an exceptional experience for residents – one that is resident-centered to create a premier lifestyle? As part of the Ginger Cove team, you will utilize your best talents and skills to support the overall wellness of our community with a focus on quality of life. Ginger Cove is a premier Life Care Community committed to quality. Our mission is to provide residents with an abundant life. To attract the best employees, we offer a comprehensive and competitive benefit package to our team. Working with resources through our benefit partners, Ginger Cove team members enjoy choice and flexibility. Our healthcare options are designed to provide you and your family with access to high-quality, affordable healthcare. We value staff excellence, resident independence, and business integrity, and we offer many employment opportunities just for you! Contact our team online today.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-diego-imperial-counties-developmental-services-inc-.jpeg
The San Diego Regional Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ginger-cove.jpeg
Ginger Cove
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The San Diego Regional Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ginger Cove
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The San Diego Regional Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ginger Cove in 2025.

Incident History — The San Diego Regional Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The San Diego Regional Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ginger Cove (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ginger Cove cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-diego-imperial-counties-developmental-services-inc-.jpeg
The San Diego Regional Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ginger-cove.jpeg
Ginger Cove
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The San Diego Regional Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ginger Cove company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ginger Cove company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The San Diego Regional Center company.

In the current year, Ginger Cove company and The San Diego Regional Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ginger Cove company nor The San Diego Regional Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ginger Cove company nor The San Diego Regional Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ginger Cove company nor The San Diego Regional Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The San Diego Regional Center company nor Ginger Cove company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The San Diego Regional Center nor Ginger Cove holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The San Diego Regional Center company nor Ginger Cove company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The San Diego Regional Center company employs more people globally than Ginger Cove company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither The San Diego Regional Center nor Ginger Cove holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The San Diego Regional Center nor Ginger Cove holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The San Diego Regional Center nor Ginger Cove holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The San Diego Regional Center nor Ginger Cove holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The San Diego Regional Center nor Ginger Cove holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The San Diego Regional Center nor Ginger Cove holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H