Comparison Overview

San Diego Copy

VS

Flint Group

San Diego Copy

undefined, undefined, undefined, 92117, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

San Diego Copy is a team of people who create, produce, and deliver quality materials and solutions in a timely manner resulting in successful relationships. From our beginning in 1993, we have added new services and invested in technologies to offer a complete line of products at the best quality to meet our clients needs. We believe quality is a combination of technical expertise, equipment performance, and the undefinable extra called service.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Flint Group

44 Esplanade, St Helier, undefined, JE4 9WG , JE
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Flint Group is dedicated to bringing colour and function to the printing and packaging products that consumers touch, see and use each day. Today, Flint Group has more to offer than ever before. We offer an unmatched product portfolio spanning inks, blankets, pressroom chemistry, consumables and colourants. With impressive global resources, local service and personalised expertise, we provide printers, publishers, packaging printers and converters with the most reliable products in the most streamlined fashion. LinkedIn plays a key role in securing the personal data that appears on LinkedIn. As the administrator of Flint Group fanpage we can only take limited actions towards personal data that you have shared on LinkedIn. In order to learn about LinkedIn measures to protect personal data, we advise you reading the text at this link: https://www.linkedin.com/legal/privacy-policy Flint Group has also taken steps to ensure the security of your personal data. We have analyzed the risks associated with individual data processing processes, and implemented appropriate security and personal data protection measures. We monitor the condition of our technical infrastructure on an ongoing basis, train staff, observe the procedures applied, and introduce necessary improvements. If you want to know more please check our Privacy statement available at this link: https://flintgrp.com/en/privacy-statement/ If you have any further questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us at [email protected] The fanpage is embedded in LinkedIn, therefore all used cookies come from LinkedIn. We encourage you to read the details on the website: https://www.linkedin.com/legal/cookie-policy. We emphasize that we have no influence on the operations performed on the basis of cookies by LinkedIn.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 3,606
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-diego-copy.jpeg
San Diego Copy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flint-group.jpeg
Flint Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
San Diego Copy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Flint Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for San Diego Copy in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flint Group in 2025.

Incident History — San Diego Copy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

San Diego Copy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Flint Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Flint Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-diego-copy.jpeg
San Diego Copy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flint-group.jpeg
Flint Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Flint Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to San Diego Copy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Flint Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to San Diego Copy company.

In the current year, Flint Group company and San Diego Copy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Flint Group company nor San Diego Copy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Flint Group company nor San Diego Copy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Flint Group company nor San Diego Copy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither San Diego Copy company nor Flint Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither San Diego Copy nor Flint Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Flint Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to San Diego Copy company.

Flint Group company employs more people globally than San Diego Copy company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither San Diego Copy nor Flint Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither San Diego Copy nor Flint Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither San Diego Copy nor Flint Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither San Diego Copy nor Flint Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither San Diego Copy nor Flint Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither San Diego Copy nor Flint Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N