Comparison Overview

SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH

VS

Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC

SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH

1131 SAN FELIPE RD, HOLLISTER, California, 95023, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

We are a Behavioral Health Department in San Benito County, providing mental health and substance use disorder services. We are small compared to many of our neighbor counties but we have made major changes to our mental health services delivery system through the Mental Health Services Act. San Benito County can offer an unsurpassed quality of life, temperate year-round climate, remarkable variety of landscapes, and proximity to a myriad of recreational, educational and cultural opportunities of the San Francisco Bay Area. San Benito County is a wonderful place to work and call home. San Benito County covers approximately 1,396 square miles ranging in elevation from near sea level to over 5,000 feet. Our County has a population of over 56,000, and is bordered to the north by Santa Clara and Santa Cruz counties, by Merced and Fresno counties to the east, and by Monterey County on the west and south. Hollister, the county seat, is approximately 95 miles south of San Francisco, 45 miles inland from Monterey. Coastal recreation or urban lifestyle is within easy driving distance, yet one can still enjoy the environment of a small town lifestyle. We are always looking for skilled professionals to join our team of mental health and substance use staff. If you think you may be interested in a career opportunity, please visit the county website at http://www.cosb.us/jobs/

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC

6515 S Rural Rd, Tempe, Arizona, undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21

In uncertain and difficult times, we recognize the need to provide integrated care. Communities, families, and individuals have unique needs, which is why we are committed to providing a variety of services suited to a wide range of financial, emotional, and interpersonal circumstances. We believe in listening to you and working together to develop a plan toward healthy change. We are invested in building a team of professionals that have a variety of experiences and training to suit your particular needs. With varied levels of licensure, we are also able to provide a wider fee structure to fit your budget. Our team is invested in supporting each other and working together to meet the needs of individuals, families, and communities. We believe that the art and technique of counseling is dynamic and one where both client and counselor alike continue to learn. To this end, our center provides a wide range of general services, including individual, couples, family, and group therapy. We are also available to present seminars and educational groups. Our team of professionals has a strong spiritual base, all with a background in integrating Christian faith and mental health services. Research demonstrates that a majority of clients seeking services report some form of faith. We believe that incorporating all facets of our humanity (emotional, physical, relational, and spiritual) improves the outcome of treatment. However, we also know that many people have been hurt by churches, ministry leaders, or Christians. We respect the differing faith traditions of our clients and, as always, you have the right to choose what issues or topics you address in counseling. We are especially passionate about encouraging healthy communication and relationships and stand strongly against the abuse of power in relationships and communities.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-benito-county-behavioral-health.jpeg
SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/journeys-counseling-center-pllc.jpeg
Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC in 2026.

Incident History — SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-benito-county-behavioral-health.jpeg
SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/journeys-counseling-center-pllc.jpeg
Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH company.

In the current year, Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC company and SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC company nor SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC company nor SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC company nor SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH company nor Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH nor Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH company nor Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH company employs more people globally than Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH nor Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH nor Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH nor Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH nor Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH nor Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SAN BENITO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH nor Journeys Counseling Center, PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N