Comparison Overview

San Antonio Zoo

VS

Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery

San Antonio Zoo

3903 N. St. Mary's, San Antonio, undefined, 78212, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

San Antonio Zoo® is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization committed to securing a future for wildlife. Through its passion and expertise in animal care, conservation, and education, the zoo’s mission is to inspire its community to love, engage with, act for and protect animals and the places they live. The zoo welcomes more than a million visitors each year and is open year round. San Antonio Zoo is accredited by both the Association of Zoos and Aquariums and the Zoological Association of America.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 376
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery

Petersfield Museum, Petersfield, undefined, GU32 3HX, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery was established in 1999 as a volunteer-run organisation, becoming a registered charity and company limited by guarantee in 2005. It is an Award Winning, Arts Council accredited, independent museum and proud to be a member of both the Museums Association and the Association of Independent Museums. In 2001 it reopened after a £4 million redevelopment project and strategic transformation, supported by the National Lottery Heritage Fund, which not only created what is in effect a brand new museum and art gallery and cultural space for East Hampshire and West Sussex, and a regional gateway for the South Downs National Park. A rare example of a restored Victorian Justice Heritage site, its permanent collections include social history archives and artefacts relating to Petersfield and the surrounding area, the Flora Twort Collection of art, an extensive Photographic Collection (including the Don Eades archive) and a Fashion and Textile Collection which includes the Bedales Historic Costume Collection. It also hosts the Tim Wilton-Steer Collection of works by and about the poet Edward Thomas in its Edward Thomas Study Centre where visitors can drop in, browse and read a book from a selection of 2,500 books whilst enjoying coffee and cake from the Museum Coffee Shop. It has been highly commended in various award categories and been the winner of the Petersfield Arts & Entertainment Award for both 2022 and 2023 - an award where the nominees are selected by and voted for by the people of Petersfield. In 2024 we will be celebrating our 25th anniversary with an exhibition that will have national and international interest.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-antonio-zoo.jpeg
San Antonio Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
San Antonio Zoo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for San Antonio Zoo in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery in 2026.

Incident History — San Antonio Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

San Antonio Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-antonio-zoo.jpeg
San Antonio Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/petersfield-museum.jpeg
Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

San Antonio Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to San Antonio Zoo company.

In the current year, Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery company and San Antonio Zoo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery company nor San Antonio Zoo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery company nor San Antonio Zoo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery company nor San Antonio Zoo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither San Antonio Zoo company nor Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither San Antonio Zoo company nor Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

San Antonio Zoo company employs more people globally than Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery holds HIPAA certification.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Petersfield Museum and Art Gallery holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H