Comparison Overview

San Antonio Zoo

VS

Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College

San Antonio Zoo

3903 N. St. Mary's, San Antonio, undefined, 78212, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

San Antonio Zoo® is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization committed to securing a future for wildlife. Through its passion and expertise in animal care, conservation, and education, the zoo’s mission is to inspire its community to love, engage with, act for and protect animals and the places they live. The zoo welcomes more than a million visitors each year and is open year round. San Antonio Zoo is accredited by both the Association of Zoos and Aquariums and the Zoological Association of America.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 376
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College

30 W Dale St, Colorado Springs, CO, 80903, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

The Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College is dedicated to elevating the individual spirit and inspiring community vitality through the performing and visual arts and arts education by providing innovative, educational and multidisciplinary, multidimensional arts experiences, building upon our history as a unique cultural pillar of the Rocky Mountain region.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 76
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-antonio-zoo.jpeg
San Antonio Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-springs-fine-arts-center.jpeg
Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
San Antonio Zoo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for San Antonio Zoo in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College in 2025.

Incident History — San Antonio Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

San Antonio Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-antonio-zoo.jpeg
San Antonio Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colorado-springs-fine-arts-center.jpeg
Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

San Antonio Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to San Antonio Zoo company.

In the current year, Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College company and San Antonio Zoo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College company nor San Antonio Zoo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College company nor San Antonio Zoo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College company nor San Antonio Zoo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither San Antonio Zoo company nor Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither San Antonio Zoo company nor Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

San Antonio Zoo company employs more people globally than Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College holds HIPAA certification.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center at Colorado College holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X