Comparison Overview

San Antonio Zoo

VS

Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum

San Antonio Zoo

3903 N. St. Mary's, San Antonio, undefined, 78212, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

San Antonio Zoo® is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization committed to securing a future for wildlife. Through its passion and expertise in animal care, conservation, and education, the zoo’s mission is to inspire its community to love, engage with, act for and protect animals and the places they live. The zoo welcomes more than a million visitors each year and is open year round. San Antonio Zoo is accredited by both the Association of Zoos and Aquariums and the Zoological Association of America.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 376
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum

1600 S. Wayne St., Auburn, 46706, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum offers over 120 cars on exhibit on three levels, nine automotive themed galleries allow the visitor to experience everything from classic cars (as defined by the Classic Car Club of America), to Indiana built cars, to racing and engineering themed exhibits and the original Auburn Automobile Company showroom and company offices. Vision: To be a vital part of our culture which inspires innovation and engages diverse audiences to create personal connections that spark passion and appreciation for how art, design, mechanics, technology, and engineering affect the world and our daily lives. Mission: To preserve the past and provide multi-generational audiences an educational and inspirational journey exploring the past, present, and future of the transportation industry while leveraging the Museum's collection as its foundation.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-antonio-zoo.jpeg
San Antonio Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/auburn-cord-duesenberg-automobile-museum.jpeg
Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
San Antonio Zoo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for San Antonio Zoo in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum in 2026.

Incident History — San Antonio Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

San Antonio Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/san-antonio-zoo.jpeg
San Antonio Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/auburn-cord-duesenberg-automobile-museum.jpeg
Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

San Antonio Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to San Antonio Zoo company.

In the current year, Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum company and San Antonio Zoo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum company nor San Antonio Zoo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum company nor San Antonio Zoo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum company nor San Antonio Zoo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither San Antonio Zoo company nor Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither San Antonio Zoo company nor Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

San Antonio Zoo company employs more people globally than Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither San Antonio Zoo nor Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H