Comparison Overview

Samsung Semiconductor

VS

Marvell Technology

Samsung Semiconductor

None
Last Update: 2026-01-20

Established in 1974 as a subsidiary of Samsung Electronics, we’re proud to be recognized as one of the leading chip manufacturers in the world. Using our knowledge in semiconductor technology, our ambition is to spark the imagination of device manufacturers with top-of-the-line building blocks and, through that, enrich the lives of people around the world with transformative solutions.

NAICS: 3344
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 9,594
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Marvell Technology

5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, 95054, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 800 and 849

We believe that infrastructure powers progress. That execution is as essential as innovation. That better collaboration builds better technology. At Marvell, We go all in with you. Focused and determined, we unite behind your goals as our own. We leverage our unrivaled portfolio of infrastructure technology to identify the best solution for your unique needs. And we sit shoulder-to-shoulder with your teams to build it. Agile in our thinking, and our partnerships, we look for unexpected connections that deliver a competitive edge and reveal new opportunities. At Marvell, we’re driven by the belief that how we do things matters just as much as what we do. Because, with a foundation built on partnership, anything is possible.

NAICS: 3344
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 10,728
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/samsungsemiconductor.jpeg
Samsung Semiconductor
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marvell.jpeg
Marvell Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Samsung Semiconductor
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Marvell Technology
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Samsung Semiconductor in 2026.

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marvell Technology in 2026.

Incident History — Samsung Semiconductor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Samsung Semiconductor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Marvell Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marvell Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/samsungsemiconductor.jpeg
Samsung Semiconductor
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Malicious Image Files, Closed-Source Library Exploitation (libimagecodec.quram.so)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marvell.jpeg
Marvell Technology
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Marvell Technology company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Samsung Semiconductor company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Samsung Semiconductor company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Marvell Technology company has not reported any.

In the current year, Marvell Technology company and Samsung Semiconductor company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Marvell Technology company nor Samsung Semiconductor company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Marvell Technology company nor Samsung Semiconductor company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Marvell Technology company nor Samsung Semiconductor company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Samsung Semiconductor company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Marvell Technology company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Samsung Semiconductor nor Marvell Technology holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Samsung Semiconductor company nor Marvell Technology company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Marvell Technology company employs more people globally than Samsung Semiconductor company, reflecting its scale as a Semiconductor Manufacturing.

Neither Samsung Semiconductor nor Marvell Technology holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Samsung Semiconductor nor Marvell Technology holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Samsung Semiconductor nor Marvell Technology holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Samsung Semiconductor nor Marvell Technology holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Samsung Semiconductor nor Marvell Technology holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Samsung Semiconductor nor Marvell Technology holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.