Comparison Overview

Sam Simon Imaging

VS

Yannick Dixon Photographic Works

Sam Simon Imaging

Last Update: 2025-12-17

I am a photographer based in Burlington Vermont, where I live with my wife and two boys. I love the outdoors and I'm an avid BMXer, hiker, and backwoods snowboarder, and I always have my camera with me. I can create intimate portraits for your family in your home or favorite space. Having a party, family reunion, graduation? I can shoot your event and create online portfolios you and your guests can purchase images from. Guided by my experience with action sports, I can also work with you to create one of a kind images that will capture your family's adventurous moments in the outdoors, on the playing field, even at the skatepark.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Yannick Dixon Photographic Works

None
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 750 and 799

Hi, I’m Yannick – a photographer, image editor, educator, vinyl collector, and dedicated tea drinker based in Lytham St Annes, Lancashire, committed to bringing you the best photography and creative services on the Fylde coast. Originally from Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire, I moved to the iconic seaside resort of Blackpool in 2003 to study BA (Hons) Photography and MA Visual Design as Creative Practice at Blackpool and the Fylde School of Art and Design. I founded Yannick Dixon Photographic Works in July 2006 and have grown the business to offer a range of professional services including editorial, product, time-lapse and wedding photography. My partners include commercial businesses, the local authorities, charities, magazines, advertising agencies and art galleries. The business serves as a platform to showcase documentary and editorial photography projects that are licensed and sold as limited edition prints. If you have any questions or want to say hello contact me via email or call me on 07790162246.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sam-simon-imaging.jpeg
Sam Simon Imaging
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yannick-dixon-photographic-works-.jpeg
Yannick Dixon Photographic Works
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sam Simon Imaging
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Yannick Dixon Photographic Works
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sam Simon Imaging in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yannick Dixon Photographic Works in 2025.

Incident History — Sam Simon Imaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sam Simon Imaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Yannick Dixon Photographic Works (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yannick Dixon Photographic Works cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sam-simon-imaging.jpeg
Sam Simon Imaging
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yannick-dixon-photographic-works-.jpeg
Yannick Dixon Photographic Works
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sam Simon Imaging company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Yannick Dixon Photographic Works company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Yannick Dixon Photographic Works company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sam Simon Imaging company.

In the current year, Yannick Dixon Photographic Works company and Sam Simon Imaging company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Yannick Dixon Photographic Works company nor Sam Simon Imaging company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Yannick Dixon Photographic Works company nor Sam Simon Imaging company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Yannick Dixon Photographic Works company nor Sam Simon Imaging company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sam Simon Imaging company nor Yannick Dixon Photographic Works company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sam Simon Imaging nor Yannick Dixon Photographic Works holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sam Simon Imaging company nor Yannick Dixon Photographic Works company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Sam Simon Imaging company and Yannick Dixon Photographic Works company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Sam Simon Imaging nor Yannick Dixon Photographic Works holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sam Simon Imaging nor Yannick Dixon Photographic Works holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sam Simon Imaging nor Yannick Dixon Photographic Works holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sam Simon Imaging nor Yannick Dixon Photographic Works holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sam Simon Imaging nor Yannick Dixon Photographic Works holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sam Simon Imaging nor Yannick Dixon Photographic Works holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N