Comparison Overview

Sam Houston Race Park

VS

Blueprint Operations Ltd

Sam Houston Race Park

7575 N. Sam Houston Parkway West, Houston, 77064, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Sam Houston Race Park (NASDAQ: PENN) is Houston’s premier horse racing and entertainment facility, located 20 minutes from downtown Houston. The track offers a variety of attractions and experiences, including 16 recently renovated luxury suites, the Pavilion Centre for up to 2,000 guests, an award-winning dining experience at the Winner’s Circle Restaurant or private-members only seating in the Jockey Club. The track hosts live Thoroughbred and Quarter Horse racing from January to June each year, in additional to hundreds of special events including concerts, festivals, charity walks and simulcast wagering from around the world. Sam Houston Race Park is Houston’s Best Bet!

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 124
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Blueprint Operations Ltd

FORTUNE HOUSE, Newark, Nottinghamshire, NG24 2EU, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

As a part of the Gauselmann Group, Blueprint Operations is a market leading supplier of gaming machines, gaming content, and cash handling technology to the UK’s AGC, Bingo, Casino & Pub sectors. Our continued success and growth underline our ability to provide market-leading solutions for all our customers no matter what sector or gaming category. We offer end-to-end gaming solutions to UK operators large or small. Our flexible product offer has something for everyone; a SGB platform for a connected estate, a choice of quality cabinets, world-class game content, first-class support & dedicated account management to help operators drive gaming revenues.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sam-houston-race-park.jpeg
Sam Houston Race Park
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blueprint-operations-limited.jpeg
Blueprint Operations Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sam Houston Race Park
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Blueprint Operations Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sam Houston Race Park in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blueprint Operations Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Sam Houston Race Park (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sam Houston Race Park cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Blueprint Operations Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blueprint Operations Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sam-houston-race-park.jpeg
Sam Houston Race Park
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blueprint-operations-limited.jpeg
Blueprint Operations Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sam Houston Race Park company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Blueprint Operations Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Blueprint Operations Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sam Houston Race Park company.

In the current year, Blueprint Operations Ltd company and Sam Houston Race Park company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Blueprint Operations Ltd company nor Sam Houston Race Park company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Blueprint Operations Ltd company nor Sam Houston Race Park company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Blueprint Operations Ltd company nor Sam Houston Race Park company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sam Houston Race Park company nor Blueprint Operations Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sam Houston Race Park nor Blueprint Operations Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sam Houston Race Park company nor Blueprint Operations Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sam Houston Race Park company employs more people globally than Blueprint Operations Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Sam Houston Race Park nor Blueprint Operations Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sam Houston Race Park nor Blueprint Operations Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sam Houston Race Park nor Blueprint Operations Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sam Houston Race Park nor Blueprint Operations Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sam Houston Race Park nor Blueprint Operations Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sam Houston Race Park nor Blueprint Operations Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H