Comparison Overview

Salisbury Poultry (Midlands) Ltd

VS

JBS

Salisbury Poultry (Midlands) Ltd

Salisbury House, Wolverhampton, undefined, WV14 7HT, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-16 (UTC)

Excellent

Welcome to Salisbury Poultry (Midlands) Limited, established in 1989. We pride ourselves on our family values and traditions. Currently supplying a complete range of UK Red Tractor Approved produce. Ranging from fresh to frozen poultry, with the ability to provide bespoke hand finished products, deboned portions, breast fillets, thigh meat and supremes, a full list of which can be found on our company website. Salisbury Poultry is a successful, progressive, caring and flexible company that works with its suppliers to provide total customer satisfaction. Using premium quality ‘A’ Grade chickens we have gained an enviable reputation for a dynamic service ensuring that customer needs are always achieved. We operate from 3 modern purpose built sites which offer excellence at competitive prices, through investment in technology and our dedicated team in which we are always looking to improve. The latest venture of Maelor Foods is underway which will be a state of the art slaughtering plant located in Wrexham.

NAICS: 311
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 134
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

JBS

Avenida Marginal Direita do Tietê, 500, São Paulo, São Paulo, 05118-100, BR
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Nós, da JBS, somos 270 mil colaboradores, que atuam em mais de 500 unidades produtivas e escritórios comerciais espalhados por mais de 20 países. Líderes globais na produção de alimentos à base de proteína, somos movidos pelo propósito de alimentar o mundo com o que há de melhor, levando excelência e inovação para aproximadamente 190 nações. Nosso portfólio de produtos é diverso e está sempre em expansão, visando englobar os mais variados tipos de proteína, produtos preparados e pratos prontos para consumo. Contamos com dezenas de marcas fortes no Brasil e exterior, como Friboi, Swift, Seara, Seara Gourmet, Incrível!, Doriana, Massa Leve, Pilgrim’s, Primo, Just Bare e Vivera. Além disso, também atuamos em setores correlacionados ao nosso core business, como couros, biodiesel, colágeno, envoltórios para embutidos, higiene & limpeza, embalagens metálicas, transportes e soluções em gestão de resíduos. De um pequeno frigorífico no interior do Brasil a uma das maiores empresas de alimentos do mundo, são 70 anos de história e evolução. JBS. Alimentando que alimenta o mundo. *** Para que esta página esteja alinhada às nossas políticas e condutas internas, não serão tolerados comentários ofensivos, inadequados ou preconceituosos, bem como ameaças, spams e divulgação de marcas ou venda de produtos. Portanto, todos os comentários que não seguirem as regras serão deletados sem aviso prévio.

NAICS: 311
NAICS Definition: Food Manufacturing
Employees: 65,210
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salisbury-poultry-midlands-ltd.jpeg
Salisbury Poultry (Midlands) Ltd
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jbs.jpeg
JBS
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Salisbury Poultry (Midlands) Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
JBS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Salisbury Poultry (Midlands) Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

JBS has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Salisbury Poultry (Midlands) Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Salisbury Poultry (Midlands) Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — JBS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JBS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salisbury-poultry-midlands-ltd.jpeg
Salisbury Poultry (Midlands) Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jbs.jpeg
JBS
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2021
Type:Breach
Motivation: Operational Disruption, Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Salisbury Poultry (Midlands) Ltd company and JBS company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

JBS company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Salisbury Poultry (Midlands) Ltd company has not reported any.

In the current year, JBS company has reported more cyber incidents than Salisbury Poultry (Midlands) Ltd company.

JBS company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Salisbury Poultry (Midlands) Ltd company has not reported such incidents publicly.

JBS company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Salisbury Poultry (Midlands) Ltd company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither JBS company nor Salisbury Poultry (Midlands) Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Salisbury Poultry (Midlands) Ltd company nor JBS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

JBS company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Salisbury Poultry (Midlands) Ltd company.

JBS company employs more people globally than Salisbury Poultry (Midlands) Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

TS3 Manager is modern web interface for maintaining Teamspeak3 servers. A reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability has been identified in versions 2.2.1 and earlier. The vulnerability exists in the error handling mechanism of the login page, where malicious scripts embedded in server hostnames are executed in the victim's browser context without proper sanitization. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

TS3 Manager is modern web interface for maintaining Teamspeak3 servers. A Denial of Dervice vulnerability has been identified in versions 2.2.1 and earlier. The vulnerability permits an unauthenticated actor to crash the application through the submission of specially crafted Unicode input, requiring no prior authentication or privileges. The flaw manifests when Unicode tag characters are submitted to the Server field on the login page. The application fails to properly handle these characters during the ASCII conversion process, resulting in an unhandled exception that terminates the application within four to five seconds of submission. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. An open redirect exists in versions 5.13.2 and below via the redir parameter on .within.website when Weblate is configured with Anubis and REDIRECT_DOMAINS is not set. An attacker can craft a URL on the legitimate domain that redirects a victim to an attacker-controlled site. The redirect can also be used to initiate drive-by downloads (redirecting to a URL that serves a malicious file), increasing the risk to end users. This issue is fixed in version 5.13.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Termix is a web-based server management platform with SSH terminal, tunneling, and file editing capabilities. The official Docker image for Termix versions 1.5.0 and below, due to being configured with an Nginx reverse proxy, causes the backend to retrieve the proxy's IP instead of the client's IP when using the req.ip method. This results in isLocalhost always returning True. Consequently, the /ssh/db/host/internal endpoint can be accessed directly without login or authentication. This endpoint records the system's stored SSH host information, including addresses, usernames, and passwords, posing an extremely high security risk. Users who use the official Termix docker image, build their own image using the official dockerfile, or utilize reverse proxy functionality will be affected by this vulnerability. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OpenPLC_V3 has a vulnerability in the enipThread function that occurs due to the lack of a return value. This leads to a crash when the server loop ends and execution hits an illegal ud2 instruction. This issue can be triggered remotely without authentication by starting the same server multiple times or if the server exits unexpectedly. The vulnerability allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) against the PLC runtime, stopping any PC started remotely without authentication. This results in the PLC process crashing and halting all automation or control logic managed by OpenPLC.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X