Comparison Overview

Salisbury House & Gardens

VS

Drents Museum

Salisbury House & Gardens

4025 Tonawanda Drive, Des Moines, IA, 50312, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Salisbury House & Gardens is a historic house museum located in Des Moines, Iowa featuring a 42-room estate surrounded by nine acres of beautiful gardens and serene woodlands. The exquisite Tudor estate was built from 1923-1928 by cosmetic magnate, Carl Weeks, and his wife Edith as their family home. The estate's Tudor stone work, Gothic arches and Carolean brickwork were inspired by the King's House in Salisbury, England. The stately interiors include intricate woodwork and architectural detail from 15th and 16th century Britain. Carl and Edith Weeks were avid and skilled collectors of books, art, historic documents, musical instruments and fine furnishings. Most of their original furnishings and collections remain at Salisbury House. Major art works by such luminaries as Sir Anthony van Dyck, Leon Kroll, Sir Thomas Lawrence, Joseph Stella and Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema line the walls, while signed books and documents from Abraham Lincoln, Ernest Hemingway, Queen Elizabeth I, James Joyce, Brigham Young, D.H. Lawrence, King Ferdinand of Aragon and many others tangibly bring history to life. Carl and Edith Weeks embraced culture over ostentation, and creativity over opulence. The Salisbury House & Gardens collections remain among our Nation's most distinctive as a result of their discernment.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Drents Museum

Brink 1, Assen, Drenthe, NL, 9400 AC
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 600 and 649

Het Drents Museum is een museum van internationale allure dat jong én oud inspireert met verhalen over archeologie, kunst en geschiedenis. Een echte publiekstrekker, niet alleen door zijn veelzijdige vaste collectie, maar zeker ook door de grote spraakmakende tentoonstellingen. Het museum geldt als een van de topattracties van Drenthe en trekt bezoekers uit het hele land naar Assen. Het Drents Museum staat voor gastvrijheid, kwaliteit, ambitie, betrouwbaarheid, ondernemerschap en samenwerking en levert een belangrijke bijdrage aan het culturele, toeristische én economische klimaat in de provincie Drenthe.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salisbury-house-&-gardens.jpeg
Salisbury House & Gardens
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/drents-museum.jpeg
Drents Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Salisbury House & Gardens
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Drents Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Salisbury House & Gardens in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Drents Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Salisbury House & Gardens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Salisbury House & Gardens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Drents Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Drents Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salisbury-house-&-gardens.jpeg
Salisbury House & Gardens
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/drents-museum.jpeg
Drents Museum
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Break-In
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Salisbury House & Gardens company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Drents Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Drents Museum company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Salisbury House & Gardens company has not reported any.

In the current year, Drents Museum company and Salisbury House & Gardens company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Drents Museum company nor Salisbury House & Gardens company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Drents Museum company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Salisbury House & Gardens company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Drents Museum company nor Salisbury House & Gardens company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Salisbury House & Gardens company nor Drents Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Salisbury House & Gardens nor Drents Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Salisbury House & Gardens company nor Drents Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Drents Museum company employs more people globally than Salisbury House & Gardens company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Salisbury House & Gardens nor Drents Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Salisbury House & Gardens nor Drents Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Salisbury House & Gardens nor Drents Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Salisbury House & Gardens nor Drents Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Salisbury House & Gardens nor Drents Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Salisbury House & Gardens nor Drents Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H