Comparison Overview

Salisbury House & Gardens

VS

Nashville Zoo

Salisbury House & Gardens

4025 Tonawanda Drive, Des Moines, IA, 50312, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Salisbury House & Gardens is a historic house museum located in Des Moines, Iowa featuring a 42-room estate surrounded by nine acres of beautiful gardens and serene woodlands. The exquisite Tudor estate was built from 1923-1928 by cosmetic magnate, Carl Weeks, and his wife Edith as their family home. The estate's Tudor stone work, Gothic arches and Carolean brickwork were inspired by the King's House in Salisbury, England. The stately interiors include intricate woodwork and architectural detail from 15th and 16th century Britain. Carl and Edith Weeks were avid and skilled collectors of books, art, historic documents, musical instruments and fine furnishings. Most of their original furnishings and collections remain at Salisbury House. Major art works by such luminaries as Sir Anthony van Dyck, Leon Kroll, Sir Thomas Lawrence, Joseph Stella and Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema line the walls, while signed books and documents from Abraham Lincoln, Ernest Hemingway, Queen Elizabeth I, James Joyce, Brigham Young, D.H. Lawrence, King Ferdinand of Aragon and many others tangibly bring history to life. Carl and Edith Weeks embraced culture over ostentation, and creativity over opulence. The Salisbury House & Gardens collections remain among our Nation's most distinctive as a result of their discernment.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Nashville Zoo

3777 Nolensville Pike, Nashville, 37211, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Nashville Zoo at Grassmere is a 188-acre institution accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) whose mission is to inspire a culture of understanding and discovery of our natural world through conservation, innovation and leadership. Located in the heart of Nashville, the zoo has an extensive animal collection within its current 88 acres of developed exhibits. The Zoo attracts more than one million visitors annually as well as serving a diverse community through outreach programs within greater Nashville and mid-Tennessee.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 306
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salisbury-house-&-gardens.jpeg
Salisbury House & Gardens
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nashville-zoo.jpeg
Nashville Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Salisbury House & Gardens
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nashville Zoo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Salisbury House & Gardens in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nashville Zoo in 2025.

Incident History — Salisbury House & Gardens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Salisbury House & Gardens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nashville Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nashville Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salisbury-house-&-gardens.jpeg
Salisbury House & Gardens
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nashville-zoo.jpeg
Nashville Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nashville Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Salisbury House & Gardens company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nashville Zoo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Salisbury House & Gardens company.

In the current year, Nashville Zoo company and Salisbury House & Gardens company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nashville Zoo company nor Salisbury House & Gardens company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nashville Zoo company nor Salisbury House & Gardens company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nashville Zoo company nor Salisbury House & Gardens company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Salisbury House & Gardens company nor Nashville Zoo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Salisbury House & Gardens nor Nashville Zoo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Salisbury House & Gardens company nor Nashville Zoo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Nashville Zoo company employs more people globally than Salisbury House & Gardens company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Salisbury House & Gardens nor Nashville Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Salisbury House & Gardens nor Nashville Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Salisbury House & Gardens nor Nashville Zoo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Salisbury House & Gardens nor Nashville Zoo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Salisbury House & Gardens nor Nashville Zoo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Salisbury House & Gardens nor Nashville Zoo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X