Comparison Overview

Salesloft

VS

Google

Salesloft

1180 West Peachtree St NW, Suite 2400, Atlanta, GA, US, 30309
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 0 and 549

Salesloft powers durable revenue growth for the world’s most demanding companies. Salesloft’s industry-leading Revenue Orchestration Platform uses purpose-built AI to help market-facing teams prioritize and take action on what matters most, from first touch to upsell and renewal. More than 5,000 customers including Google, 3M, IBM, Shopify, Square, and Cisco gain a performance force multiplier with Salesloft by shifting to a durable revenue engagement model, helping them solve the complexities of modern B2B sales and unlock revenue efficiency.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 1,182
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
2

Google

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, 94043, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 700 and 749

A problem isn't truly solved until it's solved for all. Googlers build products that help create opportunities for everyone, whether down the street or across the globe. Bring your insight, imagination and a healthy disregard for the impossible. Bring everything that makes you unique. Together, we can build for everyone. Check out our career opportunities at goo.gle/3DLEokh

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 324,578
Subsidiaries: 52
12-month incidents
15
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salesloft.jpeg
Salesloft
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/google.jpeg
Google
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Salesloft
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Google
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Salesloft has 1263.64% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Google has 3309.09% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Salesloft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Salesloft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Google (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Google cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salesloft.jpeg
Salesloft
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: compromised vendor (Salesloft), stolen authentication tokens (Salesforce Drift), cascading supply chain exploitation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: data leak site hosting, forum-based extortion
Motivation: financial gain, reputation, disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised GitHub Repository, Stolen OAuth Token, Privilege Escalation via Drift Integration, AI-Powered Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Data Theft, Espionage, Financial Gain (Potential), Supply Chain Disruption
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/google.jpeg
Google
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Email Spoofing, Messaging Platform (WhatsApp)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Fraudulent Services/Products) or Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Use-After-Free (UAF) vulnerability in the Linux HFSC queuing discipline
Motivation: Security Research and Bounty
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Prompt-injection technique through crafted HTML and CSS code
Motivation: Credential theft, social engineering
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Google company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Salesloft company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Google company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Salesloft company.

In the current year, Google company has reported more cyber incidents than Salesloft company.

Both Google company and Salesloft company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Both Google company and Salesloft company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Google company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Salesloft company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Google company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Salesloft company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Salesloft nor Google holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Google company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Salesloft company.

Google company employs more people globally than Salesloft company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Salesloft nor Google holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Salesloft nor Google holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Salesloft nor Google holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Salesloft nor Google holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Salesloft nor Google holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Salesloft nor Google holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H