Comparison Overview

SAINT LUKE ARTISTS

VS

studioline Photography

SAINT LUKE ARTISTS

17 Amhurst Terrace, Hackney, England, E8 2BT, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://saintlukeartists.com/

Saint Luke provides a unique approach to artist management. With a selectively curated roster of photographers, set designers, stylists, make-up artists, hair stylists and manicurists, Saint Luke focuses on nurturing emerging talent & creatives whilst supporting the career goals of well-established artists. Saint Luke has offices in both London and New York. Photographers: Ahmed Chrediy, Alina Asmus, Dino Kužnik, Freddy Persson, Emmie America, Hugo Mapelli, Jennifer Cheng, Rokas Darulis, Ruo Bing Li, Scarlett Casciello. Set Design: Josh Stovell, Imogen Frost, Taylor Horne, Stefania Lucchesi and Tobias Blackmore. Stylists: Brian Conway, Peghah Maleknejad, Isabel Bonner, Richard Sloan, Roberto Johnson, Victoria Bain. Hair Stylists: Attila Kenyeres, Dora Roberti, Batiseol Gomis, Karla Serrano, Raphael Salley, Karla Q Leon, Ryo Narushima, Roku Roppongi. Make-up Artists: Ariel Yeh, Andrew Colvin, Asami Matsuda, Jessica Taylor Garvin, Grace Ellington, Karla Q Leon, Mari Kuno, Nicola Brittin. Manicurists: Sasha Goddard & Hayley Evans-Smith.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

studioline Photography

Andreas-Gayk Straße, Kiel, 24103, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.studioline.de

YOU ARE BEAUTIFUL – studioline Photography setzt Dich in Szene. Bei uns erleben die Kunden ein echtes Blitzlichtgewitter und können sich wie ein Fotomodell fühlen. Das Ergebnis ist beeindruckend: fantastische Fotos zu fairen Preisen. Egal ob Business Bilder, Einzel- oder Gruppen-Portraits, privat oder geschäftlich: studioline Photography ist an über 80 Standorten in Deutschland mit seinen professionellen Fotografen vertreten.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 182
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saint-luke-artists-ltd.jpeg
SAINT LUKE ARTISTS
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studioline-photography.jpeg
studioline Photography
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SAINT LUKE ARTISTS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
studioline Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAINT LUKE ARTISTS in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for studioline Photography in 2025.

Incident History — SAINT LUKE ARTISTS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAINT LUKE ARTISTS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — studioline Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

studioline Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saint-luke-artists-ltd.jpeg
SAINT LUKE ARTISTS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studioline-photography.jpeg
studioline Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

studioline Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SAINT LUKE ARTISTS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, studioline Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SAINT LUKE ARTISTS company.

In the current year, studioline Photography company and SAINT LUKE ARTISTS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither studioline Photography company nor SAINT LUKE ARTISTS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither studioline Photography company nor SAINT LUKE ARTISTS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither studioline Photography company nor SAINT LUKE ARTISTS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SAINT LUKE ARTISTS company nor studioline Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SAINT LUKE ARTISTS nor studioline Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

studioline Photography company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SAINT LUKE ARTISTS company.

studioline Photography company employs more people globally than SAINT LUKE ARTISTS company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither SAINT LUKE ARTISTS nor studioline Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SAINT LUKE ARTISTS nor studioline Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SAINT LUKE ARTISTS nor studioline Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SAINT LUKE ARTISTS nor studioline Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SAINT LUKE ARTISTS nor studioline Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SAINT LUKE ARTISTS nor studioline Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References