Comparison Overview

Saint Louis Art Museum

VS

Portland Museum of Art

Saint Louis Art Museum

1 Fine Arts Dr, St Louis, Missouri, 63110, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://linktr.ee/stlartmuseum

The Saint Louis Art Museum collects, presents, interprets, and conserves works of art of the highest quality across time and cultures; educates, inspires discovery, and elevates the human spirit; preserves a legacy of artistic achievement for the people of St. Louis and the world; and engages, includes, and represents the full diversity of the St. Louis community supporting it. The Saint Louis Art Museum was founded in 1879, at the close of a decade that saw the establishment of art museums in great cities across the eastern half of the United States. What began as a collection of assorted plaster casts, electrotype reproductions, and other examples of good design in various media rapidly gave way to a great and varied collection of original works of art spanning five millennia and six continents. Today the quality and breadth of the Museum’s collection secure for it a place among the very best institutions of its kind.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 223
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Portland Museum of Art

7 Congress Square, Portland, ME, 04101, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://portlandmuseum.org

With an extensive collection and nationally renowned exhibitions, the Portland Museum of Art is the cultural heart of Portland, Maine. The PMA boasts significant holdings of American, European, and contemporary art, as well as iconic works from Maine—highlighting the rich artistic tradition of the state and its artists. The museum brings it all to life with unparalleled programming. From special members events, Free School Tours, and a commitment to family activities to PMA Films, curator talks, and tours of the Winslow Homer Studio—it’s all happening at the PMA.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 96
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saint-louis-art-museum.jpeg
Saint Louis Art Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/portland-museum-of-art.jpeg
Portland Museum of Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Saint Louis Art Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Portland Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Saint Louis Art Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Portland Museum of Art in 2026.

Incident History — Saint Louis Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Saint Louis Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Portland Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Portland Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saint-louis-art-museum.jpeg
Saint Louis Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/portland-museum-of-art.jpeg
Portland Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Saint Louis Art Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Portland Museum of Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Portland Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Saint Louis Art Museum company.

In the current year, Portland Museum of Art company and Saint Louis Art Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Portland Museum of Art company nor Saint Louis Art Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Portland Museum of Art company nor Saint Louis Art Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Portland Museum of Art company nor Saint Louis Art Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Saint Louis Art Museum company nor Portland Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Saint Louis Art Museum nor Portland Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Saint Louis Art Museum company nor Portland Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Saint Louis Art Museum company employs more people globally than Portland Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Saint Louis Art Museum nor Portland Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Saint Louis Art Museum nor Portland Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Saint Louis Art Museum nor Portland Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Saint Louis Art Museum nor Portland Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Saint Louis Art Museum nor Portland Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Saint Louis Art Museum nor Portland Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References