Comparison Overview

SAIEP

VS

Primark

SAIEP

Intendente Pérez Quintana Ituzaingó, Buenos Aires 1714, AR
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.laanonima.com.ar

Supermercados La Anónima es líder absoluto en el mercado de venta de productos masivos en la Patagonia, tanto por el número de locales que opera como por su nivel de ventas. Presente en 75 ciudades del interior del país. Opera con tres unidades de negocios en su actividad principal, y cuenta con un total de 128 sucursales.

NAICS: 452
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Primark

PO BOX 644, Dublin, County / Dublin postal district, Dublin 1, IE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
http://www.primark.com

Primark is an international fashion retailer employing more than 80,000 colleagues across 17 countries in Europe and the US. Founded in Ireland in 1969 under the Penneys brand, Primark aims to provide affordable choices for everyone, from great quality everyday essentials to stand-out style across women’s, men’s and kids, as well as beauty, homeware and accessories. With a focus on creating great retail experiences, Primark has over 450+ stores globally and continues to expand with the aim of reaching 530 stores by the end of 2026. ­­ Primark is working to make more sustainable fashion affordable for everyone through its Primark Cares strategy, a multi-year programme that focuses on giving clothing a longer life, protecting life on the planet and supporting the livelihoods of the people who make Primark clothes. As part of this, Primark unveiled nine commitments it is working to achieve by 2030. These commitments include making all of its clothes from recycled or more sustainably sourced materials by 2030, halving carbon emissions across its value chain and pursuing a living wage for workers in its supply chain.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 41,528
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saiep.jpeg
SAIEP
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/primark-stores-ltd.jpeg
Primark
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SAIEP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Primark
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAIEP in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Primark in 2025.

Incident History — SAIEP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAIEP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Primark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Primark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saiep.jpeg
SAIEP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/primark-stores-ltd.jpeg
Primark
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Primark company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SAIEP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Primark company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SAIEP company.

In the current year, Primark company and SAIEP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Primark company nor SAIEP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Primark company nor SAIEP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Primark company nor SAIEP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SAIEP company nor Primark company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SAIEP nor Primark holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SAIEP company nor Primark company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Primark company employs more people globally than SAIEP company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither SAIEP nor Primark holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SAIEP nor Primark holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SAIEP nor Primark holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SAIEP nor Primark holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SAIEP nor Primark holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SAIEP nor Primark holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References