Comparison Overview

SAIEP

VS

Tesco

SAIEP

Intendente Pérez Quintana Ituzaingó, Buenos Aires 1714, AR
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.laanonima.com.ar

Supermercados La Anónima es líder absoluto en el mercado de venta de productos masivos en la Patagonia, tanto por el número de locales que opera como por su nivel de ventas. Presente en 75 ciudades del interior del país. Opera con tres unidades de negocios en su actividad principal, y cuenta con un total de 128 sucursales.

NAICS: 452
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tesco

Shire Park, Kestrel Way, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, GB, AL7 1GA
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tescoplc.com

One of the world’s largest retailers of consumer goods from food to fashion. Serving our customers, communities and planet a little better every day in our stores and online is at the heart of everything we do. Founded in 1919 by Jack Cohen using the £30 he received on leaving the Royal Flying Corp, we’ve come a long way from his small market stall in East London. Today over 400,000 colleagues work across our stores, office, distribution and customer engagement centres in the UK, Europe and Asia. Share our passion for the people, products and places that make us great, and we can offer the right support to develop your skills. If you’re looking for the perfect work-life balance, a collaborative culture and flexible ways of working, find your opportunity to get on at www.tesco-careers.com

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 78,016
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saiep.jpeg
SAIEP
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/-tesco.jpeg
Tesco
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SAIEP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tesco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAIEP in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tesco in 2025.

Incident History — SAIEP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAIEP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tesco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tesco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saiep.jpeg
SAIEP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/-tesco.jpeg
Tesco
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2021
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain (Broadcom's subscription model push), Contractual Enforcement (Tesco's lawsuit)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2020
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Stolen usernames and passwords from other platforms
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Tesco company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SAIEP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tesco company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SAIEP company has not reported any.

In the current year, Tesco company and SAIEP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tesco company nor SAIEP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Tesco company has disclosed at least one data breach, while SAIEP company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Tesco company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while SAIEP company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SAIEP company nor Tesco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SAIEP nor Tesco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SAIEP company nor Tesco company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tesco company employs more people globally than SAIEP company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither SAIEP nor Tesco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SAIEP nor Tesco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SAIEP nor Tesco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SAIEP nor Tesco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SAIEP nor Tesco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SAIEP nor Tesco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References