Comparison Overview

Saginaw Industries

VS

Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL

Saginaw Industries

1622 Champagne Dr, Saginaw, MI, 48604, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Aluminum molds - we make them every day. Lost Foam design and mold making, Tooling and Part Fixtures and custom fabricated assemblies you will find these in process every day as well. Our engineering design, CNC machining, fabrication, paint, and detailed assembly processes are able to provide individual components through completed assemblies ready for installation into your processes. From mold design and development to detailed assembly product review or product development, our design team is ready to assist in lean product development and production. Starting out in 1998 as Saginaw Pattern & Machine, we have progressed beyond a traditional pattern shop to offer a full suite of services including Engineering Design, CNC Machining, Fabrication, Paint, and Detailed Assembly.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL

21b Buontempo Rd, Carrum Downs, Victoria, 3201, AU
Last Update: 2025-10-31
Between 750 and 799

Our technology maximises biogas from your waste, so that the gas becomes a valuable source of renewable energy. Meat and food processing plants have high utility costs and low profit margins. The waste water stream has a high biological load and is costly to dispose of. A biogas system will reduce the biological load in the water, generate biogas and provide renewable energy. Biogas can realise significant utility cost savings for at least 10 years. As an engineering procurement company, Energy 360 brings together industry leading biogas technology companies. Energy 360 works with clients to design a quality system which will maximise the renewable energy opportunity. Energy360 distributes ESA Pyronics burners and combustion equipment.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saginaw-industries.jpeg
Saginaw Industries
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/energy-360.jpeg
Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Saginaw Industries
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Saginaw Industries in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL in 2025.

Incident History — Saginaw Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Saginaw Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saginaw-industries.jpeg
Saginaw Industries
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/energy-360.jpeg
Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Saginaw Industries company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Saginaw Industries company.

In the current year, Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL company and Saginaw Industries company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL company nor Saginaw Industries company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL company nor Saginaw Industries company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL company nor Saginaw Industries company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Saginaw Industries company nor Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Saginaw Industries nor Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Saginaw Industries company.

Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL company employs more people globally than Saginaw Industries company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Saginaw Industries nor Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Saginaw Industries nor Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Saginaw Industries nor Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Saginaw Industries nor Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Saginaw Industries nor Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Saginaw Industries nor Energy 360 - Biogas by AGL holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H