Comparison Overview

Sagamore Industries

VS

BaySix

Sagamore Industries

101 Seaford Place, Seaford, 3198, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Established since 1958, Sagamore creates high quality, custom diaries, journals & notebooks. - Custom diaries are created as a branding recognition tool for a wide variety of industries from Associations, Real Estate Agents, Trade Supplies and Professional Services as an end of year gift - Custom notebooks support branding at events & conferences - Custom journals are used to support wellbeing programs as a self-reflection tool Sagamore are proud to be family owned and, with local manufacturing in Victoria and New South Wales is proud to support Australian jobs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BaySix

414-1 Dupont Circle, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27603, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

BaySix is a branding and imprint company focused on blending strategy and creativity to elevate your name to a brand. We often use a combination of exciting and creative printed or embroidered apparel and innovative marketing products to best represent your company and your brand. Every great idea begins with a single thought. A stroke of ink or a stitch of thread on a garment can become your masterpiece with our custom imprint options. Needing promotional products or branded swag? We also carry an exciting and creative array of high-quality marketing products. We are committed to taking your ideas and bringing them to life. Small businesses, corporations, schools, multi-sport retailers and running events, restaurants, bars, and coffee shops...no matter who you are, your name is the foundation of your business. BaySix wants to help create and strengthen that foundation. Call us today to discuss your ideas and find out how we can help!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sagamore-industries.jpeg
Sagamore Industries
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baysix.jpeg
BaySix
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sagamore Industries
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BaySix
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sagamore Industries in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BaySix in 2025.

Incident History — Sagamore Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sagamore Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BaySix (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BaySix cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sagamore-industries.jpeg
Sagamore Industries
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baysix.jpeg
BaySix
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BaySix company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sagamore Industries company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BaySix company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sagamore Industries company.

In the current year, BaySix company and Sagamore Industries company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BaySix company nor Sagamore Industries company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BaySix company nor Sagamore Industries company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BaySix company nor Sagamore Industries company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sagamore Industries company nor BaySix company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sagamore Industries nor BaySix holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sagamore Industries company nor BaySix company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BaySix company employs more people globally than Sagamore Industries company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Sagamore Industries nor BaySix holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sagamore Industries nor BaySix holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sagamore Industries nor BaySix holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sagamore Industries nor BaySix holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sagamore Industries nor BaySix holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sagamore Industries nor BaySix holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N