Comparison Overview

SAF Drives Inc.

VS

Thiele Technologies

SAF Drives Inc.

18 Neville Street, New Hamburg, ON, N3A 4G7, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

SAF is an Automation and Drives Solutions Provider that delivers turnkey solutions for new and used equipment in a myriad of industries. We strive to under-promise and over-deliver systems that meet our client’s performance and economical goals. SAF’s team of engineers understand the complex control algorithms for accurate real-time closed loop control, including speed, tension, pressure and position, setting us apart from other integration firms.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Thiele Technologies

8020 Forsyth Blvd, St Louis, Missouri, 63105, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Since 1885, Barry-Wehmiller has been a trusted partner to packaging companies around the world. Among our various BW Packaging S​ystems businesses -- Accraply, BW Flexible Systems, BW Integrated Systems, Pneumatic Scale Angelus and Synerlink -- we offer a broad range of expertise - from manufacturing, packaging and materials handling to process optimization, line integration, plant design and implementation, and more. So, whether you’re looking for a single piece of equipment or the design and installation of a fully integrated line, BW Packaging S​ystems will deliver a tailor-made solution to solve your unique packaging challenges.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 149
Subsidiaries: 34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saf-drives-inc-.jpeg
SAF Drives Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bwpackagingsystems.jpeg
Thiele Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SAF Drives Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Thiele Technologies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAF Drives Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thiele Technologies in 2025.

Incident History — SAF Drives Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAF Drives Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Thiele Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thiele Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saf-drives-inc-.jpeg
SAF Drives Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bwpackagingsystems.jpeg
Thiele Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Thiele Technologies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SAF Drives Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Thiele Technologies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SAF Drives Inc. company.

In the current year, Thiele Technologies company and SAF Drives Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Thiele Technologies company nor SAF Drives Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Thiele Technologies company nor SAF Drives Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Thiele Technologies company nor SAF Drives Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SAF Drives Inc. company nor Thiele Technologies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SAF Drives Inc. nor Thiele Technologies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Thiele Technologies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SAF Drives Inc. company.

Thiele Technologies company employs more people globally than SAF Drives Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither SAF Drives Inc. nor Thiele Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SAF Drives Inc. nor Thiele Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SAF Drives Inc. nor Thiele Technologies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SAF Drives Inc. nor Thiele Technologies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SAF Drives Inc. nor Thiele Technologies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SAF Drives Inc. nor Thiele Technologies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H