Comparison Overview

Sabre Australia and New Zealand

VS

Verizon

Sabre Australia and New Zealand

Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 750 and 799

TECHNOLOGY THAT POWERS TRAVEL Sabre Australia and New Zealand is part of Sabre Corporation, a leading technology provider to the global travel and tourism industry. Sabre’s software, data, mobile and distribution solutions lead the industry in connecting the global travel ecosystem. In the South Pacific we combine global technology expertise with deep local market knowledge, relationships and operations. Our offices in Sydney, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Adelaide and Auckland are here to help transform the traveller experience across the South Pacific region. Contact us at [email protected] to find out more. OUR MISSION An innovative technology company that leads the travel industry by helping our customers succeed.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Verizon

One Verizon Way, Basking Ridge, NJ, US, 07920-1097
Last Update: 2026-04-01

We get you. You want more out of a career. A place to share your ideas freely — even if they’re daring or different. Where the true you can learn, grow, and thrive. You’ll find all that here. Because we empower you. We power and empower how people live, work and play by connecting them to what brings them joy. The same is true inside our walls. We do what we love — driving innovation, creativity, and impact in the world. And wherever you go, we got your back. This is a team sport. Our V Team is a community of people who anticipate, lead, and believe that listening is where learning begins. In crisis and in celebration, we come together— lifting our communities and building trust in how we show up, everywhere & always. Want in? Join the V Team Life.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 101,542
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
14
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sabre-australia-and-new-zealand.jpeg
Sabre Australia and New Zealand
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/verizon.jpeg
Verizon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sabre Australia and New Zealand
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Verizon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sabre Australia and New Zealand in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Verizon has 143.9% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Sabre Australia and New Zealand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sabre Australia and New Zealand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Verizon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Verizon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sabre-australia-and-new-zealand.jpeg
Sabre Australia and New Zealand
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/verizon.jpeg
Verizon
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Brute-force SSH credentials, Exploitation of unpatched network devices, File transfer utilities (wget, curl, tftp, ftpget)
Motivation: Financial gain, Resource exploitation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Stolen Credentials, Phishing/Social Engineering, Infostealer Malware, Proximity Card Theft, Unattended Endpoints
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Sabre Australia and New Zealand company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Verizon company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Verizon company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Sabre Australia and New Zealand company.

In the current year, Verizon company has reported more cyber incidents than Sabre Australia and New Zealand company.

Verizon company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Sabre Australia and New Zealand company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Verizon company and Sabre Australia and New Zealand company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Verizon company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Sabre Australia and New Zealand company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Verizon company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Sabre Australia and New Zealand company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor Verizon holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Verizon company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sabre Australia and New Zealand company.

Verizon company employs more people globally than Sabre Australia and New Zealand company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor Verizon holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor Verizon holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor Verizon holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor Verizon holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor Verizon holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor Verizon holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H