Comparison Overview

Sabre Australia and New Zealand

VS

LexisNexis

Sabre Australia and New Zealand

Last Update: 2026-04-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sabre.com/anz

TECHNOLOGY THAT POWERS TRAVEL Sabre Australia and New Zealand is part of Sabre Corporation, a leading technology provider to the global travel and tourism industry. Sabre’s software, data, mobile and distribution solutions lead the industry in connecting the global travel ecosystem. In the South Pacific we combine global technology expertise with deep local market knowledge, relationships and operations. Our offices in Sydney, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Adelaide and Auckland are here to help transform the traveller experience across the South Pacific region. Contact us at [email protected] to find out more. OUR MISSION An innovative technology company that leads the travel industry by helping our customers succeed.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1
View Profile

LexisNexis

230 Park Avenue, New York City, 10017, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 0 and 549
https://www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/about-us/about-us.page

LexisNexis is a leading innovator of private, secure, and authoritative Legal AI solutions that help legal and business professionals draft full documents with ease, make informed decisions faster, and deliver outstanding work and improved outcomes, all powered by trusted content. LexisNexis Legal & Professional serves customers in more than 150 countries with 11,800 employees worldwide, and is part of RELX, a global provider of information-based analytics and decision tools for professional and business customers.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,705
Subsidiaries: 72
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sabre-australia-and-new-zealand.jpeg
Sabre Australia and New Zealand
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexisnexis.jpeg
LexisNexis
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sabre Australia and New Zealand
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LexisNexis
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sabre Australia and New Zealand in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

LexisNexis has 21.95% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Sabre Australia and New Zealand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sabre Australia and New Zealand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LexisNexis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LexisNexis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sabre-australia-and-new-zealand.jpeg
Sabre Australia and New Zealand
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lexisnexis.jpeg
LexisNexis
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of unpatched vulnerability (React2Shell)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of unpatched React2Shell vulnerability in frontend application
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unpatched Vulnerability (React2Shell)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Sabre Australia and New Zealand company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LexisNexis company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

LexisNexis company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Sabre Australia and New Zealand company.

In the current year, LexisNexis company has reported more cyber incidents than Sabre Australia and New Zealand company.

Neither LexisNexis company nor Sabre Australia and New Zealand company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both LexisNexis company and Sabre Australia and New Zealand company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither LexisNexis company nor Sabre Australia and New Zealand company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand company nor LexisNexis company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor LexisNexis holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

LexisNexis company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sabre Australia and New Zealand company.

LexisNexis company employs more people globally than Sabre Australia and New Zealand company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor LexisNexis holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor LexisNexis holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor LexisNexis holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor LexisNexis holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor LexisNexis holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor LexisNexis holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References