Comparison Overview

Sabre Australia and New Zealand

VS

Avanade

Sabre Australia and New Zealand

Last Update: 2026-04-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sabre.com/anz

TECHNOLOGY THAT POWERS TRAVEL Sabre Australia and New Zealand is part of Sabre Corporation, a leading technology provider to the global travel and tourism industry. Sabre’s software, data, mobile and distribution solutions lead the industry in connecting the global travel ecosystem. In the South Pacific we combine global technology expertise with deep local market knowledge, relationships and operations. Our offices in Sydney, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth, Adelaide and Auckland are here to help transform the traveller experience across the South Pacific region. Contact us at [email protected] to find out more. OUR MISSION An innovative technology company that leads the travel industry by helping our customers succeed.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Avanade

1191 2nd Ave, Seattle, Washington, US, 98101
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
https://www.avanade.com/en?utm_campaign=nullgtmcam-ao&utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=socor-glb&_bl=%7BcreativeId%7D

Avanade is the world’s leading expert on Microsoft. Trusted by over 7,000 clients worldwide, we deliver AI-driven solutions that unlock the full potential of people and technology, optimize operations, foster innovation and drive growth. As Microsoft’s Global SI Partner we combine global scale with local expertise in AI, cloud, data analytics, cybersecurity, and ERP to design solutions that prioritize people and drive meaningful impact. We champion diversity, inclusion, and sustainability, ensuring our work benefits society and business.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 17,197
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sabre-australia-and-new-zealand.jpeg
Sabre Australia and New Zealand
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avanade.jpeg
Avanade
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sabre Australia and New Zealand
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Avanade
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sabre Australia and New Zealand in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avanade in 2026.

Incident History — Sabre Australia and New Zealand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sabre Australia and New Zealand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Avanade (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avanade cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sabre-australia-and-new-zealand.jpeg
Sabre Australia and New Zealand
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avanade.jpeg
Avanade
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Avanade company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sabre Australia and New Zealand company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sabre Australia and New Zealand company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Avanade company has not reported any.

In the current year, Avanade company and Sabre Australia and New Zealand company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Avanade company nor Sabre Australia and New Zealand company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Sabre Australia and New Zealand company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Avanade company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Avanade company nor Sabre Australia and New Zealand company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand company nor Avanade company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor Avanade holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Avanade company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sabre Australia and New Zealand company.

Avanade company employs more people globally than Sabre Australia and New Zealand company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor Avanade holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor Avanade holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor Avanade holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor Avanade holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor Avanade holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sabre Australia and New Zealand nor Avanade holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References