Comparison Overview

SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd

VS

Unitech Engineering Ltd

SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd

Langstone Technology Park 2B Langstone Road Saacke Combustion Services Ltd, Havant, undefined, PO91SA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

SAACKE is your qualified partner when it comes to highly efficient, reliable combustion plants with low emissions. Our products not only meet industrial requirements, but also the highest ecological standards. When it comes to thermal processes, you benefit from SAACKE engineering and service experience from more than 20,000 installed plants worldwide. We have been involved in combustion technology for more than 90 years and today we are one of the world leaders in this field. As specialists, we plan, develop and produce burners and system solutions for industrial thermal processes. Our products and services are represented in industry as well as on ships and offshore installations. Our range extends from standardised products for generating electricity, steam and heat, to special solutions for the energetic use of residues.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 62
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Unitech Engineering Ltd

Prospect Road, Burntwood, Staffordshire, WS7 0AL, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Unitech is a leading supplier of high quality stainless steel and aluminium equipment to the food, beverage, pharmaceutical and other hygiene conscious industries. Operating from our 75,000 square foot production facility in the heart of the West Midlands we offer a range of 'off the shelf'​ products as well as bespoke fabrications. We also have, through our experience the expertise to offer full turnkey projects with many impressive references both in the UK and worldwide. In more recent years the Unitech group has grown substantially and still continues to grow. You will see below some of the Unitech group companies and the services they provide. Whatever your needs, contact us today, we are sure to have an answer to your procurement needs.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saacke-combustion-services-ltd.jpeg
SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unitech-engineering-limited.jpeg
Unitech Engineering Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Unitech Engineering Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unitech Engineering Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Unitech Engineering Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unitech Engineering Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saacke-combustion-services-ltd.jpeg
SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unitech-engineering-limited.jpeg
Unitech Engineering Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd company and Unitech Engineering Ltd company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Unitech Engineering Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd company.

In the current year, Unitech Engineering Ltd company and SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Unitech Engineering Ltd company nor SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Unitech Engineering Ltd company nor SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Unitech Engineering Ltd company nor SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd company nor Unitech Engineering Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd nor Unitech Engineering Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd company nor Unitech Engineering Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Unitech Engineering Ltd company employs more people globally than SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd nor Unitech Engineering Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd nor Unitech Engineering Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd nor Unitech Engineering Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd nor Unitech Engineering Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd nor Unitech Engineering Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SAACKE Combustion Services Ltd nor Unitech Engineering Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H