Comparison Overview

SA Health

VS

Providence

SA Health

Citi Centre Building, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Welcome to SA Health. Our vision The best health for South Australians. At SA Health we are committed to protecting and improving the health of all South Australians. We do this by providing leadership in health reform, public health services, health and medical research, policy development and planning, with an increased focus on wellbeing, early intervention and quality care. Our public health services meet the needs of South Australians in metropolitan and regional locations through a network of hospitals and health services. Our mission SA Health will lead and deliver a comprehensive and sustainable health system that aims to ensure healthier, longer and better lives for all South Australians. Our values SA Health is committed to the values of integrity, respect and accountability. We value care, excellence, innovation, creativity, leadership and equity in health care provision and health outcomes. We demonstrate our values in our interactions with others in SA Health, the community and those for whom we care.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 8,642
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Providence

US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 700 and 749

Every day, 119,000 compassionate caregivers serve patients and communities through Providence St. Joseph Health, a national, Catholic, not-for-profit health system, driven by a belief that health is a human right. Rooted in the founding missions of the Sisters of Providence and the Sisters of St. Joseph of Orange, courageous women ahead of their time who brought health care and other social services to the American West when it was still a rugged, untamed frontier, we share a singular commitment to improve the health of all. From our earliest days, we’ve met new challenges by pioneering new solutions. Today, with 51 hospitals, 829 clinics and a comprehensive range of services, we strive to meet the needs of communities across Alaska, California, Montana, New Mexico, Oregon, Texas and Washington through a diverse family of Catholic, other faith-based and mission-driven secular organizations. Now, as we face a new frontier—a changing health care landscape—we draw upon their pioneering and compassionate spirit to plan for the next century of health for a better world, especially for the poor and vulnerable. If you need treatment, please visit www.providence.org to locate a health care provider.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 49,284
Subsidiaries: 30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sa-health.jpeg
SA Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/providencehealthsystem.jpeg
Providence
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SA Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Providence
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SA Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Providence in 2025.

Incident History — SA Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SA Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Providence (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Providence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sa-health.jpeg
SA Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unintentional Human Error
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/providencehealthsystem.jpeg
Providence
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Unauthorized data access and system encryption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Providence company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SA Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Providence company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to SA Health company.

In the current year, Providence company and SA Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Providence company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while SA Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Providence company has disclosed at least one data breach, while SA Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Providence company nor SA Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SA Health company nor Providence company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SA Health nor Providence holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Providence company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SA Health company.

Providence company employs more people globally than SA Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither SA Health nor Providence holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SA Health nor Providence holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SA Health nor Providence holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SA Health nor Providence holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SA Health nor Providence holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SA Health nor Providence holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H