Comparison Overview

Sexual Assault Center

VS

The Brain-Heart Connection

Sexual Assault Center

101 French Landing Drive, Nashville, 37228, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Mission: To provide healing for children, adults and families affected by sexual assault and to end sexual violence through counseling, education and advocacy. The Sexual Assault Center is dedicated to fighting the epidemic of sexual violence and its effects on the individuals and families affected. Since opening our doors in 1978, S.A.C. has created a safe environment where each year men, women and children find support, counseling and healing. Our specially trained therapists create individual treatment plans using a variety of proven practices for each client. With the knowledge that sexual violence is a preventable crime, educating students and adults through our primary prevention programs, engaging with state and U.S. legislation for the benefit of survivors and changing cultural norms is a top priority. We have been recognized for our work to end sexual violence; most recently by the NSRVC as a recipient of the 2015 Visionary Voice Award.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 194
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Brain-Heart Connection

undefined, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, 90004, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Brain-Heart Connection is a private practice founded by Dr. Laura O’Connor, a licensed clinical psychologist in Los Angeles. We provide a wide range of neuropsychological testing services to help both children and adults better understand their personal strengths and challenges — and achieve their true potential. Our individualized assessments are designed to address your questions or concerns, whether they be cognitive, academic, social, emotional, or vocational.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sa-center.jpeg
Sexual Assault Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-brain-heart-connection.jpeg
The Brain-Heart Connection
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sexual Assault Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Brain-Heart Connection
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sexual Assault Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Brain-Heart Connection in 2026.

Incident History — Sexual Assault Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sexual Assault Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Brain-Heart Connection (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Brain-Heart Connection cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sa-center.jpeg
Sexual Assault Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-brain-heart-connection.jpeg
The Brain-Heart Connection
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sexual Assault Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Brain-Heart Connection company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Brain-Heart Connection company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Sexual Assault Center company.

In the current year, The Brain-Heart Connection company and Sexual Assault Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Brain-Heart Connection company nor Sexual Assault Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Brain-Heart Connection company nor Sexual Assault Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Brain-Heart Connection company nor Sexual Assault Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Sexual Assault Center company nor The Brain-Heart Connection company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sexual Assault Center nor The Brain-Heart Connection holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sexual Assault Center company nor The Brain-Heart Connection company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sexual Assault Center company employs more people globally than The Brain-Heart Connection company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Sexual Assault Center nor The Brain-Heart Connection holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sexual Assault Center nor The Brain-Heart Connection holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sexual Assault Center nor The Brain-Heart Connection holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sexual Assault Center nor The Brain-Heart Connection holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sexual Assault Center nor The Brain-Heart Connection holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sexual Assault Center nor The Brain-Heart Connection holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H